Answer:
The correct option is C) The number of protons is equal to the number of electrons.
Explanation:
Atoms are made up of particles called protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons are in the center of the atom and form the nucleus, while electrons surround the nucleus. Electrons have a negative charge. The charge of the protons is positive and finally, the neutrons have no charge.
If the atom has no charge, this means that the total charge of the atomic nucleus, which is positive due to the presence of the protons, is equal to the negative charge of the electrons, so that it cancels out.
So, <u><em>the correct option is C) The number of protons is equal to the number of electrons.</em></u>
Put a thermometer in the water and wait until it boils. When it boils record the temperature and compare it to the normal water boiling point.
Both designed a periodic table of elements- Mendeleev designed the first one in order of atomic mass and Moseley designed the modern one in order of atomic number. ... Isotope- Because of the notation and the 13 is not the atomic mass on the periodic table so it is the same element just a different form.
Ngl idk but just be a nice person and mark as brainliest please
Answer: The distance is slightly less than 3.5 m
Explanation: assuming wall and target are the same thing, and the bullet has constant velocity, the bullet will travel 7 m in half a second, so half that distance is 3.5 m.
In reality, the bullet is decelerating (at an unknown rate) so the distance is slightly less than 3.5 m.
There is also a vertical velocity component, which means it hits the target/wall at an angle. The trajectory is such that it hits the wall above the shooter because the ricochet hits at ~the level at which it left the firearm.
If the wall was absent, the bullet would have described a parabola which brough it back to the initial level after 7m. This could be calculated, but it means that the actual distance between the shooter and the wall is slightly less than 3.5 m
In addition, the collision with the wall is not 100% elastic, so the velocity aftercthe ricochetvis further reduced.
A calculation would be complex because these confounding factors are not completely independent of each other, but all reduce the average velocity and therefore the distance.
Therefore it is only possible to say that the distance was somewhat less than 3.5 m
