Answer: a motion for summary disposition or summary judgement.
Explanation:
A summary judgement is also known as summary disposition or judgement as a matter of law. A summary judgement is a judgement that is entered by a court for a party at the expense of another party which is summarized. It is a judgement without a full trial.
Summary judgement can be as a result of discretion in the case or merits of a case. The above case is an example as both parties agree to the facts with Delta supporting it with sworn statements.
Answer:
No, she did not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to answer if Mae stayed within her budget, given her budget and the total amount she later spent.
To solve this problem, what we need to do is to add up all what she budgeted. Afterwards we add up all she spent. Then , we see the difference between the two to actually know if she stayed within her budget of not.
We proceed as follows:;
Let’s calculate budgeted amount: This is ; 180 + 475 + 15 + 50 + 65 + 25 + 150 + 30 = $990
Now, let’s calculate how much she later spent; That would be; 182 + 475 + 12 + 65 + 68 + 12.5 + 36 + 150 = $1000.5
We can see that she spent more that the amount she had budgeted. This means she didn’t stay within the total amount allocated for her budget
The price should you be willing to pay for this stock is $24.86
<h3>Zephyr Inc. sells wind based systems for generating electricity. The company pays no dividends, but you estimate the stock will be worth $50 per share 5 years from now and you require a 15% rate of return for stock investments of this type. What price should you be willing to pay for this stock?</h3>
A) $12.50.
B) $24.86.
C) $43.48.
D) $57.50.
Solution:
The price that will be paid for this stock can be calculated as follows:
50= x (15/100^5)
50= x (0.15+1^5)
50= x (1.15^5)
50= 2.0113x
Divide both sides by the coefficient of x
= 50/2.0113
= 24.86
Thus, the price that will be paid for the stock is $24.86
To learn more about the sum, refer
brainly.com/question/24244811
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. VRIN test, which asks if a resource is valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable.
Explanation:
Applying Barney's (1991) VRIN framework can determine if a resource is a source of competitive power. To serve as a basis for sustainable competitive advantage, resources must be:
valuable: meaning that they must be a source of greater value, in terms of relative costs and benefits, than similar resources in competing firms. When resources are able to bring value to the firm they can be a source of competitive power.
rare: rareness implies that the resource must be rare in the sense that it is scarce relative to demand for its use or what it produces. Resources have to deliver a unique strategy to provide a competitive advantage to the firm as compared to the competing firms. Consider the case where a resource is valuable but it exists in the competitor firms as well. Such a resource is not rare to provide competitive power.
inimitable: it is difficult to imitate. Resources can be sources of sustained competitive power if competing firms cannot obtain them. Consider the case where a resource is valuable and rare but the competing organizations can copy them easily. Such resources also cannot be sources of competitive power.
non-substitutable: other different types of resources cannot be functional substitutes. Resources should not be able to be replaced by any other strategically equivalent valuable resources. If two resources can be utilized separately to implement the same strategy then they are strategically equivalent. Such resources are substitutable and so are not sources of sustained competitive power.
The criteria of the VRIN Framework clearly rules out best practices as a source of competitive advantage. If other firms can easily understand and copy a capability, it is not a source of competitive power.
