1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sati [7]
3 years ago
7

If Mars were the same size as Mercury (instead of its actual size), which surface features would it have?

Physics
1 answer:
choli [55]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A surface that is full of craters, very similar to that one seen in mercury.

Explanation:

Mercury is the smaller planet in the solar system whit a very thin atmosphere. If Mars were the same size of mercury it will certainly have a surface full of craters.

When meteoroid (fragments of rock) reach the atmosphere of a planet, they get incinerate as a consequence of the friction between the object and the atmosphere. However, if the meteoroid has the necessary size it can reach the ground (at this point is known as meteorite).

In the case propose, it is most likely that bigger meteorite reach the surface of the planet, which leads to the result of a surface full of craters since the size of mars is not enough to maintain a very dense atmosphere due to the weak gravitational field.

You might be interested in
A boy falls and hits his head with an impulse of 20N-s. On cement, the boy would hit for
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

xjdifjfiiiffiigigififidghffigfigivig

Explanation:

bye

5 0
3 years ago
A thin rod of length 0.75 m and mass 0.42 kg is suspended freely from one end. It is pulled to one side and then allowed to swin
Goshia [24]

Answer:

(A) 0.63 J  

(B) 0.15 m

Explanation:

length (L) = 0.75 m

mass (m) =0.42 kg

angular speed (ω) = 4 rad/s

To solve the questions (a) and (b) we first need to calculate the rotational inertia of the rod (I)

I = Ic + mh^{2}  

Ic is the rotational inertia of the rod about an axis passing trough its centre of mass and parallel to the rotational axis

h is the horizontal distance between the center of mass and the rotational axis of the rod

I = (\frac{1}{12})(mL^{2} ) + m([tex]\frac{L}{2})^{2}[/tex]

I = (\frac{1}{12})(0.42 x 0.75^{2} ) + ( 0.42 x ([tex]\frac{0.75}{2})^{2}[/tex])

I = 0.07875 kg.m^{2}

(A) rods kinetic energy = 0.5Iω^{2}

  = 0.5 x 0.07875 x 4^{2} = 0.63 J   0.15 m

(B) from the conservation of energy

   initial kinetic energy + initial potential energy = final kinetic energy + final potential energy

   Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf

   at the maximum height velocity = 0 therefore final kinetic energy = 0

   Ki + Ui = Uf

   Ki = Uf - Ui

 Ki =  mg(H-h)

where (H-h) = rise in the center of mass

     0.63 = 0.42 x 9.8 x (H-h)

   (H-h) = 0.15 m

6 0
3 years ago
Give at least two reasons today’s astronomers are so interested in the discovery of additional Earth-approaching asteroids.
blondinia [14]

Answer:

1. Potential hazard

2. Mining opportunity

Explanation:

The two reason, why astronomers are so interested in the discovery of additional Earth-approaching asteroids:

1. Potential hazard: We have proof that the dinosaurs got extinct because of an asteroid/comet strike on Earth. Also we have seen the effects of the Tunguska event and Chelyabinsk tragedy. These are enough to show us that asteroids can be very dangerous and wipe out the life from Earth.

2. Mining Opportunity: We have discovered a lot of asteroids which contains a lot of metal and precious elements. There can be a possibility of mining such asteroids in the future and reducing the burden on Earth.

4 0
3 years ago
1. I drop a penny from the top of the tower at the front of Fort Collins High School and it takes 1.85 seconds to hit the ground
Svetradugi [14.3K]
You have three known variables:

Acceleration - 9.8m/s^2
Time - 1.85s
Initial Velocity - 0m/s

For the first part of your question:

v = u + at

v = (0)+(9.8)(1.1)

v = 10.78 m/s  v=11 m/s (2 significant figures)

For the second part of your question:

v=u+at

v=(0)+(9.8)(1.85)
v=18.13 m/s



This still needs to be converted to m/h:

18.13m/s = 18.13\times 3600 metres/h=65628  metres/hour

65628 metres/hour = 65628\div1600 mi/h = 40.7925 mi/h

= 41 mi/hr (2 significant figures)





5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Green plants convert light energy from the sun into ______. * a. gravitational potential energy b. chemical potential energy c.
katrin [286]

Answer:

chemical potiential energy

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which layer of ground contain organic matter and tiny rock particles
    8·1 answer
  • Does this show the geocentric or heliocentric idea of the solar system? Explain the difference
    5·2 answers
  • A balloon starts rising from rest from the ground with an acceleration of 1.25 m/s2. After 8s, a stone is released from the ball
    10·1 answer
  • 1 point
    15·2 answers
  • Each time you dumped the pennies, one half-life passed; it has been shown that the half-life for this radioactive isotope is 20
    6·1 answer
  • How to calculate kinetic energy of a projectile at the highest point of a projectile?
    10·2 answers
  • What's the difference between work and power
    13·2 answers
  • A roller coaster car has 600,00 J of Kinetic energy as it approaches the station to stop. The roller coaster comes to a complete
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME ASAP I NEED IN FIVE MINUTES!!!!!! I WILL MARK BRAINLYEST AND WILL GIVE 10 EXTRA POINTS!!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • A thermionic tube with only a cathode and an anode is called?​
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!