1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
a_sh-v [17]
3 years ago
10

The relationship between observation and hypotheses

Physics
1 answer:
dedylja [7]3 years ago
6 0
Hypothesis is a guess and observation observes the guess
You might be interested in
An athlete swings a ball, connected to the end of a chain, in a horizontal circle. The athlete is able to rotate the ball at the
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

a) 2nd case rate of rotation gives the greater speed for the ball

b) 1534.98 m/s^2

c) 1515.04 m/s^2

Explanation:

(a) v = ωR

when R = 0.60, ω = 8.05×2π

v = 0.60×8.05×2π = 30.34 m/s

Now in 2nd case

when R = 0.90, ω = 6.53×2π

v = 0.90×6.53×2π = 36.92 m/s

6.35 rev/s gives greater speed for the ball.

(b) a = ω^2 R = (8.05×2π)^2 )(0.60) = 1534.98 m/s^2

(c) a = ω^2 R = (6.53×2π)^2 )(0.90) = 1515.05 m/s^2

7 0
3 years ago
A piece of toast weighing 8 grams is flying through the air at 15
Ket [755]

The kinetic energy of toast is 0.06 J.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Kinetic energy is the way to determine the energy released when an object is in motion. In other times, it can be the energy required to move any object and to make it in motion.

As the mass of the toast is given as 8 g and speed is given as 15 m/s, if we ignore the friction caused by air molecules. Then the kinetic energy is the product of mass and square of velocity.

K.E. = \frac{1}{2} × mass × v²

Kinetic energy =\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{8}{1000} \times 15

Since, the weight is given in grams , it needed to be converted into kg.

Kinetic energy = 0.06 J

Thus, the kinetic energy of toast is 0.06 J.

6 0
3 years ago
Why are TV shows nowadays so boring?
Anna [14]

The answer is a matter of opinion, and you're going to get different answers
from different people.  Here's <u>my</u> take on it:

The writers, producers and advertising sponsors of these shows certainly
don't think they're boring.  And <em><u>definitely</u></em> neither do the TV networks that
decide which ones to broadcast. 

I'm not trying to say "The experts don't think they're boring, so you must
be wrong".  I'm trying to say that different people have different opinions
about the same shows, and in <em>your</em> case,<em> you</em> find them boring.

My conclusion is this: 
I think you're finding TV shows boring nowadays because you're growing
as a person.  You've grown, developed, and matured to the point where
you're above the level of audience that the shows are pitched for.  That's
a very good thing !

You're sad because you used to get pleasure and entertainment from TV,
and now it doesn't give you those things.  That's like losing an old friend,
that you used to have such fun playing with, but he just doesn't do it for
you any more.

Now that you've grown up, you've made new friends.  With them, you do
things that you wouldn't even understand with your younger friends.  And
you develop new interests, like ... I don't know ... books, movies, hobbies,
your church, your profession, learning new things, developing new skills,
exercising your brain, writing, volunteer work, ham radio, building fine
furniture, singing, learning to write music, raising tropical plants, sculpture,
politics ... whatever turns you on.  Some people never grow past the stage
where staring at the tube is all they need in life, because they don't have
what it takes to be interested in anything else.  Those are the people that
TV is aimed at.  But you have more, and that's why TV isn't enough for you.

There are other possible reasons why TV bores you.  But until I know more
about you, I think it's a very, very good sign.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Formula for percentage error​
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

PE = (|accepted value – experimental value| \ accepted value) x 100%

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Question 2: In 2-4 sentences, explain what would happen to the cell if the nucleus didn’t work?
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

Then the cell won't be able to function properly. With no nucleus the cell will lose control. It won't know what to do and there will be no cell division.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the tide cycle affect erosion along a sea coast?
    5·1 answer
  • Two long parallel wires each carry 2.2 A in the same direction, with their centers 1.8 cm apart.A. Find the magnitude of the mag
    15·1 answer
  • Franz Mesmer believed that his ability to heal people was based on his manipulation of which force
    13·2 answers
  • Stars located near _____ appears to move in circles when viewed from earth
    11·1 answer
  • How does charging by conduction occur?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain applications
    14·1 answer
  • Can there be a virus that can turn humans into phsyical zombies or something like that?...​
    13·1 answer
  • Proverbs from taiwanese<br><br>water can help a boat float, but it can also sink it​
    11·2 answers
  • The instruments carried by a spacecraft are called the
    10·2 answers
  • The cost of gas is $1.27 per liter. How much does a gallon of gas costs?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!