Need help please!!!

Cheese sticks that were previously priced at "10 for $1" are now "4 for $1". Find each percent change.

statuscvo [17]

original quantity : 10 for $1

new quantity: 4 for $1

now we have to find each percent change

10-4=6

6÷100=0.06

0.06=6%

the quantity went down 6%

6 0

3 years ago

According to the Census Bureau, 3.39 people reside in the typical American household. A sample of 26 households in Arizona retir

Vikki [24]

Answer:

$t=\frac{2.73-3.39}{\frac{1.22}{\sqrt{26}}}=-2.758$

$df=n-1=26-1=25$

$p_v =P(t_{(25)}$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level 0.1 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude that the true mean is significanlty lower than 3.39 personas at 10% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$\bar X=2.73$ represent the sample mean

$s=1.22$ represent the sample standard deviation

$n=26$ sample size

$\mu_o =3.39$ represent the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.1$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true mean is less than 3.39 persons, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu \geq 3.39$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu < 3.39$

The statistic is given by:

$t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}$ (1)

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$t=\frac{2.73-3.39}{\frac{1.22}{\sqrt{26}}}=-2.758$

P-value

The degreed of freedom are given by:

$df=n-1=26-1=25$

Since is a one sided lower test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(t_{(25)}$

Conclusion

Since the p value is lower than the significance level 0.1 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude that the true mean is significanlty lower than 3.39 personas at 10% of significance.

3 0

3 years ago

Boole summation formula used in real life

Inga [223]

Elbert frank cox? I think

5 0

3 years ago

What is 89+198345+19845-8 rounded to the nearest 10

nika2105 [10]

Answer:

89-198345-19850 that's to the the tenth

4 0

3 years ago

According to chebyshev's theorem, the maximum proportion of data values from a data set that are more than 2 standard deviations

vodka [1.7K]

<span>All you have to do is learn Chebyshev's theorem in terms of k, then substitute 2 for k. Here is Chebyshev's theorem in terms of k: According to Chebyshev's theorem, the proportion of values from a data set that is further than standard deviations from the mean is at most . Then when you plug in 2 for k, you get: According to Chebyshev's theorem, the proportion of values from a data set that is further than standard deviations from the mean is at most . or writing for , According to Chebyshev's theorem, the proportion of values from a data set that is further than standard deviations from the mean is at most . Or if you prefer a decimal answer: According to Chebyshev's theorem, the proportion of values from a data set that is further than standard deviations from the mean is at most . Or if you prefer a percent answer: According to Chebyshev's theorem, the proportion of values from a data set that is further than standard deviations from the mean is at most %. </span>

5 0

3 years ago