The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can answer the following.
If I’m doing research on communication apprehension and I define high apprehension as someone who has at least 8 "ums," "uhs," or "ers" in a five minute period, I have created a(n): operational definition.
After doing part of your research, you will be able to get some definitions straight, created by yourself. In this case, you can come up with an operational definition. which means that you collect the proper data and define it in a clear, concise way. So your operational definition can express with clarity one of the objects of the study.
Answer:
A) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
Mrs. Jonas believes strongly that it is important that workers' rights be respected, and that one of the more important ways of doing this is to ensure that all workers be properly documented. She is supervising a contracting company that is building a new warehouse for her company. While doing this she discovers that many of the workers employed by the contractor are undocumented aliens working for well below minimum wage.
Mrs. Jonas is likely experiencing cognitive dissonance. She is experiencing cognitive dissonance, any incompatibility an individual might perceive between two or more attitudes or between behavior and attitudes.In cognitive dissonance , a person who is in a situation to experience contradictory belief, attitudes or ideas
Answer:
The correct answer is Option A) Trait theories of leadership.
Explanation:
The trait theory of leadership is based on the idea that true leaders have innate characteristics that make them good leaders like charisma, charm, and confidence. In this perspective, there are leaders and non-leaders and the qualities of leadership cannot be learned, you are born with them. The trait theory of leadership is often tied to Thoman Carlyle and his notion of the Great Man Theory of Leadership.
Answer:
is the author an expert, who wrote the info, does the info seem reasonable, is the info given from a specific pov
Explanation:
whether you agree or not does not determine something's credibility
Answer:
you can take over the world mwahahaha, muwhahaha, muahahaha, bwahahaha
Explanation: