Answer:
false ig because animal cell is not complex(i am not sure)
Technically you are able to argue both ends. Biotic factors are living things while abiotic factors are no living things. since the plant was once living, you can argue that it is a biotic factor, however, I would say the dead plant decay would be abiotic because it is not living anymore. I hope that helped!
I would say C.
I hope it’s right or u can individually search up each of those animals to check that they’re a secondary consumer.
Answer:
The conclusion that cuckolder are able to discriminate kin from non kin
Explanation:
From the above question, researchers carried out tests on the two types of fish (males cuckolder and parental males) to see if they can identify kin and non kin from the offsprings, using a null test.
But the test for cuckolder was rejected by the researchers for the cuckolder so they can't say cuckolder can indentify between kins and non kins, they didn't pass the test so it should be concluded that cuckolder can't identify between kin and non kin, instead of concluding they can identify them, that is the wrong conclusion.
The answer is A. Morphology/anatomy is considered more
relevant than behavior or general appearance in the classification of organisms. It
is due to these anatomical features that animals such as bats are classified differently
from birds (with bats classified as mammals even though they fly like birds) due to differences in anatomical features
like milk-producing glands and brain structure.
