Se necesita fuerza continua para el movimiento continuo?

1 answer:

8 0

¿Se necesita fuerza continua para un movimiento continuo? No exactamente, ya que la fuerza que se aplica para mantener un objeto en movimiento solo se usa para que la fuerza de fricción pueda ser contrarrestada. Si un astronauta arrojara, digamos, una computadora portátil al espacio durante una caminata espacial (por qué arrojar una tableta perfectamente buena en el esquema interminable del cosmos, no lo sé), viajaría con una velocidad constante para siempre, a menos que golpea algo También podría reemplazar la computadora portátil con Voyager 2, que se mantuvo en movimiento y ahora está fuera de nuestro sistema solar. Esto se debe a que el espacio está mayormente vacío y no habría ninguna fuerza de fricción que actúe sobre esa roca. A menos que sea golpeado por un asteriodo o algo así, lo que haría una pregunta física diferente.

Espero que esto ayude, ¡TENGA UN DÍA BENDITO Y MARAVILLOSO! ¡Y un gran fin de semana de Superbowl! :-)

- Cutiepatutie ☺❀❤

You might be interested in

A cylindrical tank has a radius of 53 cm and a height of 1200 mm. It weighs 9.6 kN

xxTIMURxx [149]

Answer:

1985kg

Explanation:

assuming that

pi =3.14

oil density = 950kg/ cubic meter

g= 9.8m/s

$M=\frac{9600}{9.8 } + 950 * 3.14*.53^{2} *1.2=1985kg$

4 0

3 years ago

Pls do question 1 part d). tysm

Aneli [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

cuz its informing the length of 5 and weight on 20N

5 0

3 years ago

Picture showing four cards in a row with labels 'First animal appears on land', 'First life form appears in the sea', 'First roc

sasho [114]

The answer would be 'First rocks formed on Earth'.

3 0

3 years ago

An emf source of 6.0V is connected to a purely resistive lamp and a current of 2.0 amperes flows. All the wires are resistance-f

IgorC [24]

Resistance = (voltage) / (current)

Resistance = (6.0 v) / (2.0 A)

Resistance = 3.0 ohms

7 0

3 years ago

Two cars having different weights are traveling on a level surface at different constant velocities. Within the same time interv

GuDViN [60]

I think you're saying that once you start pushing on the cars, you want to be able to stop each one in the same time.

This is sneaky. At first, I thought it must be both 'c' and 'd'. But it's not
kinetic energy, for reasons I'm not ambitious enough to go into.
(And besides, there's no great honor awarded around here for explaining
why any given choice is NOT the answer.)

The answer is momentum.

Momentum is (mass x speed). Change in momentum is (force x time).

No matter the weight (mass) or speed of the car, the one with the greater
momentum is always the one that will require the greater (force x time)
to stop it. If the time is the same for any car, then more momentum
will always require more force.

4 0

3 years ago