1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gayaneshka [121]
3 years ago
5

In trying to determine the seriousness of his relationship with vicky, brent carefully analyzes what he is putting into the rela

tionship versus what he is getting out of it. the theory of love that would best explain brent's approach is
Social Studies
1 answer:
Nutka1998 [239]3 years ago
4 0
<span>In trying to determine the seriousness of his relationship with Vicky, Brent carefully analyzes what he is putting into the relationship versus what he is getting out of it. The theory of love that would best explain Brent's approach is the social exchange theory. This theory are based on these three principles; the chances of the couple of having a better relationship with someone else, the equilibrium relationship between what we get out of it and what we put it in and the kind of relationship the individual deserves.</span>
You might be interested in
What is securalism? ​
sineoko [7]

I've heard individuals say things like, "You have to be secular," "I am secular," etc. even in academic contexts. Then there are some who despise secularism as the ruin of this nation. Secularism is viewed as a moral value by the pro-Secularism camp. According to the anti-Secilarim camp, it is equivalent to minoritarianism.

Both parties are mistaken and misinformed.

First and foremost, we need to understand that secularism is NOT for INDIVIDUALS. For the SYSTEM, that is.

Since secularism and religious freedom are mutually exclusive, no constitution that protects religious freedom can also impose secularism on its citizens. A separation from religion is secularism. It is the system, not the individual, that is required to dissociate.

The term "System" designates the complete administrative framework, including each of its constituent and contributing parts. The System includes everything that has to do with administration, formulation and application of policy, and law and justice. These must all be unbiased toward religion. The secular discipline also applies to the political organizations that take part in the process of electing the legislative bodies. Therefore, when a political party makes the claim that it is "secular," it is attempting the age-old ruse of constructing a virtue out of a need. It cannot be anything but secular. Similar to this, a government cannot avoid being secular. The courts, bureaucracy, and legislature all operate similarly. When we refer to ourselves as a "secular nation," we mean this.

Being Secular entails being cut off from Religion. This is a requirement of the Government, not of the people who make up the Government. The same is true of the other institutions that make up the democratic system. Secularism is an institution's character, not the personality of its employees. For instance, the Prime Minister must maintain his secularity while doing his official duties, but not in his personal life. Although the members who make up a political party are allowed to follow their faith, the essence of the organization's operations must be secular. Most individuals are unaware of this.

Secularism, as a constitutional ideal, is, nevertheless, consistently violated by the political and administrative establishments, both in letter and in spirit. A secular government cannot use its policies and programs to favor or disparage any religion. However, we see that governments, both at the federal level and at the state level, flagrantly break this cardinal rule by enacting religiously-specific social assistance programs that favor certain people while excluding others. Other fundamental protections, such equality and the prohibition of discrimination based on race, religion, or other factors, are also infringed as a result. This flagrant constitutional breach is not questioned or opposed.

The canvassing of votes in the name of religion is expressly prohibited. This is what the law says:

<em>"Section 123(3) of the Act* prohibits canvassing by an electoral candidate to woo voters in the name of race, caste, religion, community and language. It also prohibits usage of religious symbols or national symbols or flag for canvassing purposes. Usage of the aforesaid are considered to be corrupt practices. The electoral candidates cannot promise any public policy which they propose to implement on being successful."</em>

<em />

[*The 'Act' refers to the Representation of the People Act 1951]

Despite the fact that this is the law, the reality during election season is the complete reverse. Why doesn't anyone challenge it? Why doesn't anyone care about it? Every day we chant hymns to secularism, yet when it comes to actual practice, we disrespect it in spirit and soul. That is the major flaw in our democratic system.

Secularism itself is not the bad guy; its improper use is.

Thank you,

Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
The difference between normative and meta ethics​
Licemer1 [7]

Answer: Normative ethics would generally ask what right action is. ... Metaethics, on the other hand, would call into question what it means to say that any action is "correct", whether this type of evaluation is objective or subjective, universal or particular

Explanation :

7 0
2 years ago
What about Phoenician geography made them rely on imports and exports?
-Dominant- [34]

The Phoenicians were based on a narrow coastal strip of the Levant which gave them an excellent transcontinental position. They used their seafaring skills and created a network of colonies and trade centers across the ancient Mediterranean. Phoenician sea trade can be divided into that for its colonies and that with fellow trading civilizations. The Phoenicians not only imported what they needed and exported what they cultivated and manufactured but they could also act as middlemen traders.

8 0
2 years ago
How does social inequality correlate to the nature of class
sveticcg [70]

There is a strong correlation between the nature of social class and <em>social inequality</em>.

The stratification of <em>social classes</em> not only depend on wealth, but also on factors like education and a person's occupation. This means that people in the same social class, besides being in the same range of wealth, also share the same lifestyle and similar social honors from others.

<em>Social inequality</em> occurs when the sole distribution of wealth is unequal among all of the members of a given society.

Wealth is a powerful factor that enables a person to achieve a better education and eventually escalate to upper social classes. This is where social inequality relates with the nature of social classes.

4 0
3 years ago
Is it likely that mesosaurus swam back and forth across the Atlantic ocean
leva [86]
Mesosaurus was significant in providing evidence for the theory of continental drift, because its remains were found in southern Africa and eastern South America, two widely separated regions. As Mesosaurus was a coastal animal, and therefore could not have crossed the Atlantic Ocean, this distribution indicated that the two continents used to be joined together.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is the 300 year period of time in Greece beginning around 1100 BC called the dark age
    8·1 answer
  • Critics of the wealth gap might argue that
    15·2 answers
  • A space blank and travel to the moon and four days
    8·1 answer
  • What did the Andean and mid-latitude countries do after gaining independence
    15·1 answer
  • How does society help science advance? . A. Society’s biases steer scientists toward studying certain ideas. B. Society produces
    10·2 answers
  • Culture is a word for the ___________of groups of people.
    12·2 answers
  • What factor contributed to the baby boom after World War II?
    7·2 answers
  • Why does Western Europe have such mild climates? I need it now please
    7·2 answers
  • what strategy does wilmington use in paragprah 3 to connect her audience more closely with her subject matter
    12·1 answer
  • Why did John L. Lewis establish the Committee for Industrial Organization?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!