Answer:
The correct response is "Internal validity".
Explanation:
- Internal validity would be the extent through which a record an accounting a reliable reason as well as effect correlation among both medications as well as consequence.
- Perhaps it speaks to the fact that the original study ends up making it achievable to help reduce possible causes for something like a discovering.
Answer:
I`d write an answer but what`s the question here . . . ?
Answer:
<em>Comparative analysis.</em>
Explanation:
The fundamental premise of the <u>comparative analysis </u>is that <u>research can reveal more about the subject of the study if a set of data about first subject is compared to the same set of data about another subject. </u>
Essentially, it works from the idea that to understand anything about something we have to compare it to anything else. For example, darkness is dark only comparing to light. Without this comparison, darkness does not have its meaning of the absence of light.
Comparative analysis as a type of analysis is widely used in social science, in particular as Qualitative comparative analysis.
Answer:
During the period beginning on the 30th day before the date a regular legislative session convenes and continuing through the 20th day after the date of final adjournment
Explanation:
As stated in the Chapter 253 of the Election Code, during the time commencing on the 30th day prior to the time legislative activities start and continuing until the 20th day after the date of the final adjournment was made, Political Action Committees (PACs) are not allowed to make political contributions to a statewide officeholder or a member of the legislature or special-purpose committee.
Answer:
make enquiries or do a survey with people who have gone through the process
