(B)
if <em>f</em>(a) = K, then that means <em>f </em>sends (a) to (K).
the inverse function, <em>f</em>-1, goes back where you started, so <em>f</em>-1 <em />sends (K) to (a).
<em>f</em>-1(K) = a.
no solution off the bus 60th and you can get
Answer:
Yes. There is sufficient eveidence to support the claim that Wilmington resident's earn more than the national average
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the following;

#We set our hypothesis as:

The rejection region of either hypothesis:
, we determine the critical values for this probability in the T distribution table;

=>We reject for all values greater than 1.833, t>1.833.
#We now determine the value of the test statistic as:

We find that:

Hence, there is sufficient eveidence to support the claim that Wilmington resident's earn more than the national average.
Answer:
if my calculator is not wrong Is 21
Replace a and b with the given values:
3.14(3^2 + 3x4)
Simplify:
3.14(9 +12)
3.14(21)
Multiply:
3.14 x 21 =65.94