1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesya [120]
3 years ago
15

The sum of three prime numbers (other than two) is always odd.

Mathematics
1 answer:
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
6 0

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement in the above question is True.

Sum of three prime numbers (other than  two)  is always odd.

Going by Christian Goldbach number theory ,

  • Goldbach stated that every odd whole number greater than 5 can be written as sum of three prime numbers .  

 Lets take an example,

  • 3 + 3 + 5 = 11
  • 3 + 5 + 5 = 13
  • 5 + 5 + 7 = 17

Later on in 2013  the Mathematician <u>Harald Helfgott</u> proved this theory true for all odd numbers greater than five.

You might be interested in
What is the greatest common factor of 56 and 42
liberstina [14]
Your Answer would be 14.
4 0
3 years ago
You use which of the following methods to solve a logic puzzle?
pickupchik [31]

Answer:

Logic puzzles use grids to help you make eliminations based on deciphering the truth in the clues provided.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2⋅(3 6 ⋅ 3−5) Evaluate the expression.
aleksley [76]
On 3 and 6 you did not clarify whether it is addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division.
Therefore, I have worked out all possible solutions.

If 2(3 - 6 x 3 - 5) then the solution is 12.<span>

If 2(3 + 6 x 3 - 5) then the solution is -36.</span><span>

If 2(3 / 6 x 3 - 5) then the solution is -2.

If 2(3 x 6 x 3 - 5) then the solution is -72.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Pleasee help me .Use each digits 2,3,7,8 to make numbers FROM 20,21,22 SO ON ALL THE WAY TO 50 FOR EXAMPLE 2+3+7+8=20
Ahat [919]
2,3,7,8=
1)3*7=21
2)2*8+7=32
3)7*3+8=29
4)7*3+2=23
5)7*8 divided by 2=28
6)8*3=24
7)2*3*8=48
Hopes This Helps :)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer.
Damm [24]

Answer:

D (I think?)

Step-by-step explanation:

It's neither a nor b because neither of them would work if you plug in o for x.

The reason I think it's D and not C is because it goes up by 10,000 x (1.1)^x

Just not sure because because of how the question was asked. Hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Resolver la inecuacion 3x -14 &lt;7x -2
    13·1 answer
  • The first term of a sequence is -12. The recursive formula for the sequence is an = an-1 + 9. What are the next 3 terms in the s
    14·1 answer
  • Three weeks ago John bought stock at 49 1/4; today the stock is valued at 49 7/8. We could say the stock is performing at which
    5·2 answers
  • Simplify -8/2 divided by 6/-3
    14·1 answer
  • LAST ONE SORRY I REALLY NEED HELP ON THIS ONEEEE
    13·1 answer
  • Put the following fractions in order of size starting with the one with the least value 5/16 1/2 3/4 5/8 1/4
    13·2 answers
  • "A day care program has an average daily expense of $75.00. The standard deviation is $5.00. The owner takes a sample of 64 bill
    9·2 answers
  • What’s the answer to. -4w &gt; 12*
    7·1 answer
  • Y = x - 5 <br> x + y = -1
    5·1 answer
  • What is log(21x2) written in expanded form?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!