1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KatRina [158]
3 years ago
6

PLEASE HELP!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
Vikentia [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Part a) The inequality that represent the situation is

x+(3x)+(6x) \leq 350\ in  

Part b) The possible lengths of the shortest piece of wire are all positive real numbers less than or equal to 35\ inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

x------> the length of the first wire

3x---> the length of the second wire

2(3x)=6x -----> the length of the third wire

Part a) WRITE AN *INEQUALITY* THAT MODELS THE SITUATION

we know that

The inequality that represent the situation is

x+(3x)+(6x) \leq 350

Part b) WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE LENGTHS OF THE SHORTEST PIECE OF WIRE?

we know that

The shortest piece of wire is the first wire

so

Solve the inequality

x+(3x)+(6x) \leq 350

10x \leq 350

Divide by 10 both sides

x \leq 35\ in

The possible lengths of the shortest piece of wire are all positive real numbers less than or equal to 35\ inches

You might be interested in
25 of blank is 60<br> enter the unknown value that makes it true
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

240

Step-by-step explanation:

25% of 240 is 60

4 0
3 years ago
Giving branlist if you get it correct!!!
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

x - 10  = 28

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, a U.S. government agency, 17.3% of 8th graders in 2010 had used marijuana at
miskamm [114]

Answer:

The conditions for use of the normal model to represent the distribution of sample proportion are not met. He should increase the sample size until the conditions are met.

If the test is done anyway, the null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

The conclusion is taht there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the percentage is lower in this district.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conditions for use of the normal model to represent the distribution of sample proportion are not met, as the affirmative responses are less than 10.

np=80*0.1=8

If the test of hypothesis is done as if the conditiones were met, we know that the claim is that  the percentage is lower in this district.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \pi=0.173\\\\H_a:\pi

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=80.

The sample proportion is p=0.1.

 

The standard error of the proportion is:

\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.173*0.827}{80}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.001788}=0.042

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

z=\dfrac{p-\pi+0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.1-0.173+0.5/80}{0.042}=\dfrac{-0.067}{0.042}=-1.578

This test is a left-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

P-value=P(z

As the P-value (0.057) is greater than the significance level (0.05), the effect is  not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that  the percentage is lower in this district.

7 0
3 years ago
Lola and Brandon had a running race. They ran 3/10 of a mile. Lola was in the lead for 4/5 of the distance. For what fraction of
Kruka [31]

Answer:

Lola was in lead for \frac{6}{25} of a mile.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have been given that Lola and Brandon had a running race. They ran 3/10 of a mile. Lola was in the lead for 4/5 of the distance.

To find the fraction of a mile for which Lola was in the lead, we need to find 4/5 of 3/10 as:

\text{Fraction for which Lola was in lead}=\frac{3}{10}\times\frac{4}{5}

\text{Fraction for which Lola was in lead}=\frac{3}{5}\times\frac{2}{5}

\text{Fraction for which Lola was in lead}=\frac{3\times2}{5\times5}

\text{Fraction for which Lola was in lead}=\frac{6}{25}

Therefore, Lola was in lead for \frac{6}{25} of a mile.

7 0
3 years ago
3x+2=5x What is the answer for this solving equations with variables on each side
Yanka [14]
3x +2= 5x
-3x
2= 2x
/2
1= x
So first I got all the x’s on one side and the whole numbers on the other side. So we had 2 on one side and 2x on the other. From there we divided by the number of x’s which was 2 so we can get one x only. So 2/2= 1 so x =1
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the unit cost?
    7·1 answer
  • Given p(x) = 2x3 − 8x2 + 13x − 21, ___ is a factor because ___.
    9·1 answer
  • Solve the equation 4=t/2.5 t=
    7·2 answers
  • What is 4/5+1/4 ? In fraction form.
    12·1 answer
  • 33.6 x 3.1 with explained answer please help ASAP
    5·2 answers
  • Please help meeeeeeee​
    13·2 answers
  • - 7th Grade work -<br><br> Pls just say if it's a, b, c, or d.
    13·2 answers
  • Help help help heeeelllpppp
    5·1 answer
  • Write an integer to represent a temperature of 2,500 above sea level
    9·1 answer
  • Louis is filling two tanks of water in his home. Tank A currently contains 27 gallons and has a hose filling it at
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!