Answer:
The answer is "50%"
Explanation:
Modify the state budget Act of 1974 to boost the FY in 1994 and 1995. It is the maximum federal debt quantity and also to set these other quantities for FY 1996 to 1998. Repudiates in the 1994 and 1995 boundaries on consumption spending.
In the Act of 1993, it modifies the 1986 active losses restrictions so, that it allowed rental damages from other revenues to also be deducted from persons who significantly participated such rental properties.
The person may allocate 50% to his time towards services rendered throughout a tax year from the business.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A partnership is a type of business owned by two or more individuals known as partners. The partners join forces to exploits their talents and resources and profit from the business. A partnership may comprise of general and limited /silents partners.
The general partner participates in the day to day activities of the business. He or she makes business decisions on behalf of the partnership. Because a general partner is actively involved in managing the business, he has unlimited liability to its obligations. Should the partnership fail to meet its obligation, the assets of a general partner sold to settle the debts. He or she need not have been involved in creating the liability.
Answer:
$1 or 100% of the tax
Explanation:
When the price elasticity of demand is 0, it means that the good or service will be purchased regardless of its cost. Very few things have such a low price elasticity, and the fact that this is drug for treating cancer is the reason why that happens. Anyone that can purchase a drug that will keep you alive, will do so as long as you have enough money to do so. Another good with a very low price elasticity, but not 0, is gasoline with a 0.02 to 0.04, and gasoline is a basic necessity also.
The curve for a perfectly inelastic good is vertical. So any increase in taxes will be paid by the customers.
Solution :
It is given that Fizzo and Pop Hop sells orange soda. Fizzo advertises about his drinks while Pop Hop does not advertises.
According to the matrix provided we can conclude that :
-- If Fizzo wishes to advertise about his soda drinks, he will earn a profit of 8 million dollar and if Pop Hop do advertises and a 15 million dollar if Pop Hop does not advertises.
-- If Fizzo does not advertise, it will earn profit of about 2 million dollar if Pop Hop advertises and 9 million dollar if Pop Hop does not advertises.
-- When Pop Hop wished to advertise , Fizzo will make a higher profit if he chooses to advertise.
-- When Pop Hop do not advertise, Fizzo will make a higher profit when it chooses to advertise.
And if both the firms acts independently and they start off not advertising, then --- both firms will advertise as both of them will earn highest profits each.
If both the firms collude and both firms start off not advertising, the strategies they will end up is that both the firms will not advertise as the joint profit will be maximized.
Answer:
The answer is:
Asset will be overstated
Net income will be overstated
Explanation:
Because of the incorrect capitalization(the process of converting or adding to a firm's asset):
1. Assets are overstated. Assets that shouldn't are added to the entire assets are added. So it's increasing the company's asset whereas it's not.
2. Net income are overstated. Because depreciation too will have to be charged for the asset that wasn't there, therefore, net asset will be overstated.
