Answer:
, inside the plane
Explanation:
We need to calculate the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field produced by each wire first, using the formula

where
is the vacuum permeability
I is the current
r is the distance from the wire
For the top wire,
I = 4.00 A
r = d/2 = 0.105 m (since we are evaluating the field half-way between the two wires)
so

And using the right-hand rule (thumb in the same direction as the current (to the right), other fingers wrapped around the thumb indicating the direction of the magnetic field lines), we find that the direction of the field lines at point P is inside the plane
For the bottom wire,
I = 5.90 A
r = 0.105 m
so

And using the right-hand rule (thumb in the same direction as the current (to the left), other fingers wrapped around the thumb indicating the direction of the magnetic field lines), we find that the direction of the field lines at point P is also inside the plane
So both field add together at point P, and the magnitude of the resultant field is:

And the direction is inside the plane.
I’m pretty sure subpolar low goes with heavy precipitation, little wind. horse latitudes goes with two wind systems originate here. and intertropical convergence zone goes with convergence of westerlies and polar easterlies. that’s what i think, sorry if i’m wrong
Answer:
D
Explanation:
A) is not correct, because the gravitation potential energy will depend on the height the block is located at. It will be calculated with the formula:
U=mgh.
If we take the ground as a zero height reference, then on point 2 the potential energy will be:


While on point 3, the potential energy will be greater.


B) is not the right answer because the kinetic energy will vary with the height the block is located at in the fact that the energy is conserved (this is if we don't take friction into account or air resistance) so in this case:

We already know the potential energy at point 2. We can calculate the kinetic energy at point 3 like this:



So the kinetic energy at point 2 is given by the equation:

so:


As you may see the kinetic energy at point 2 is greater than the kinetic energy at point 3.
C) Is not correct because according to the first law of thermodinamics, energy is not lost, only transformed. So, since we are not taking into account friction or any other kind of loss, then we can say that the amount of mechanical energy at point 1 is exactly the same as the mechanical energy at point 3.
D) Because of what we talked about on part C, this will be the true situation, because the mechanical energy of the block will be the same no matter theh point you measure it at.