Answer:
(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
Explanation:
The trade is one strong reflection for many weak reflections (and more dangerous near-Earth space travel).
None of the answer choices except the last one has anything to do with the effect of exploding a satellite. When you are arguing that exploding a satellite is ill conceived, you need to address specifically the effects of exploding the satellite.
To solve this problem we will apply the concepts related to wavelength as the rate of change of the speed of the wave over the frequency. Mathematically this is

Here,
v = Wave velocity
f = Frequency,
Replacing with our values we have that,

\lambda = 0.68m
The distance to move one speaker is half this

Therefore the minimum distance will be 0.34m
Answer:
Granite
Explanation:
Trust me I learned this 2years ago
Answer:
Explanation:
The path length difference = extra distance traveled
The destructive interference condition is:

where m =0,1, 2,3........
So, ←
![\Delta d = (m+1/2)\lamb da9/tex]so [tex]\Delta d = \frac{\lambda}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CDelta%20d%20%3D%20%28m%2B1%2F2%29%5Clamb%20da9%2Ftex%5D%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3C%2Fp%3E%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3Eso%20%3C%2Fstrong%3E%5Btex%5D%5CDelta%20d%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Clambda%7D%7B2%7D)
⇒ λ = 2Δd = 2×10 = 20