You reject the Null Hypothesis when you have a small P-Value. Here is an example! Also we never accept the null hypothesis, think of it like this if we bring someone to court you wouldn't say their innocent of a crime, you only know that if they do not get convicted of the crime they are not guilty in the eyes of the law. Same thing applies here, since there could be several answers that satisfy our assumptions made, we can not be certain that 1 of those assumptions is the REAL answer it's just AN answer.
Answer 10
This is the formula of an arithmetic sequence.
a
n
=
a
1
+
d
(
n
−
1
)
a
n
=
a
1
+
d
(
n
-
1
)
Substitute in the values of
a
1
=
1
a
1
=
1
and
d
=
3
d
=
3
.
a
n
=
1
+
(
3
)
(
n
−
1
)
a
n
=
1
+
(
3
)
(
n
-
1
)
Simplify each term.
a
n
=
1
+
3
n
−
3
a
n
=
1
+
3
n
-
3
Subtract
3
3
from
1
1
.
a
n
=
3
n
−
2
Answer:
D) -4, 0
Step-by-step explanation:
find common difference.
the common difference appears to be +4 as you must add 4 to -12 to get to -8
now we find the missing terms.
the previous term of the first missing term is -8
if the common difference is +4 then the next term would be -8 + 4 = -4
the term after that would be -4 + 4 = 0
the two missing terms are -4 and 0
Liz attempted to factor 36. Since 36 = 3*12 and not 3+12, this is not the way to go. In stead of factoring 36, she should have split it into a friendly sum, like 36=30+6.
Then Step 1 should have been 27(6+30).
