All categories

3 years ago

Which series of atomic numbers represents the ordering of consecutive elements within the periodic table?

2 answers:

8 0

The series of atomic numbers that represents the ordering of consecutive elements within the periodic table is the last option - 1, 2, 3, 4...
It refers to the number of atoms that each element has, which rises by one with each element.

statuscvo [17]3 years ago

4 0

Atomic number is same as the number of protons in the element which is further equal to the number of electrons. As the number of electrons increases in the element, the atomic number of the element also increases.

In periodic table, elements are arranged in the groups, and these groups are columns starting from 1 to 18, elements are arranged in increasing order of atomic number. Elements are placed with difference of one atomic number.

First four elements present in the periodic table is:

$He$ atomic number is one (1).

$H$ atomic number is two (2).

$Li$ atomic number is three (3).

$Be$ atomic number is four (4).

Thus, the series of atomic numbers that represents the ordering of consecutive elements within the periodic table is the last option - 1, 2, 3, 4...

You might be interested in

The magnitude of an earthquake, measured on the Richter Scale, is M log1o T where / is the amplitude registered on a seismograph

just olya [345]

<u>Answer:</u> The magnitude rating for an earthquake causing an amplitude 10,000,000 times $I_o$ is 7.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Richter scale is defined as the scale which expresses the magnitude of earthquake on the basis of the seismograph oscillations.

The equation used to measure the magnitude of an earthquake on Richter scale is:

$M=log_{10}\frac{I}{I_o}$

where

I = amplitude registered on seismograph 100 km away from seismic center = $10,000,000I_o$

$I_o$ = small amplitude

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$M=\log_{10}(\frac{10000000I_o}{I_o})\\\\M=7$

Hence, the magnitude rating for an earthquake causing an amplitude 10,000,000 times $I_o$ is 7.

8 0

2 years ago

Question 2 3 pts Which solution is the most acidic?

Drupady [299]

Answer:

En general, la adicción se considera una enfermedad crónica que ocurre tras el consumo continuado de una droga durante un período de tiempo relativamente largo. Por tanto, el principal factor desencadenante de la enfermedad es el consumo mismo de la droga.Sep 16, 2019

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Ch4+202==>c02+302 what type of chemical reaction

n200080 [17]

Answer:

First of all, the equation is typed wrong so it can easily be misinterpreted

Ethane (CH4) + Oxygen gas (O2) would give us Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and WATER (H2O)

CH4 + 2O2 -----> CO2 + 2H2O

And this is a combustion reaction since we have oxygen as a reactant and carbon dioxide and water as products.

4 0

2 years ago

Select all steps below that you followed to practice laboratory safety during the experiment. used tongs or a test tube holder t

uysha [10]

Explanation:

Steps followed to practice laboratory safety during the experiment are as follows.

Used tongs or a test tube holder to hold materials over the Bunsen burner flame.
Wore gloves and goggles.
Made careful observations of the products and reactants.
Did not smell the gases produced.

When we heat a test tube over bunsen flame then the tube gets hot and when we hold it with bare hands then out hands will burn. Therefore, it is advised to hold test tube with the help of tongs or a holder so that our hands did not burn.

We should also wear gloves and goggles so that any acid would not spill directly on our hands, skin and eyes as it can affect or damage the skin severely.

Careful observations were made so that correct calculations about the experiment can be carried out.

It is also advised that we should not smell the gases produced but gases move freely from one place to another in a laboratory or any where else.

So, we can try to avoid it by covering our mouth with a cloth but we cannot stop it. If we keep on inhaling the gases produced in a laboratory then it can also lead to severe disease or defect in the human body.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2000 minutes to hours dimensional analysis

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

33.33 h

Explanation:

You know that

1 h = 60 min

If you divide both sides by 60 min, you get the conversion factor: 1 h/60 min = 1.

If you divide both sides by 1 h, you get the conversion factor: 1 = 60 min/1 h.

Both are conversion factors because they both equal one and multiplying a measurement by one does not change its value.

You choose the conversion factor that gives you the correct dimensions for your answer. It must have the correct dimensions on top (in the numerator),

Thus, to convert 2000 min to hours, you use the conversion factor with “h” on the top.

$\text{Time} = \text{2000 min} \times \dfrac{\text{1 h}}{\text{60 min}} = \textbf{33.33 h}$

5 0

2 years ago