1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio [31]
3 years ago
9

A student conducted an experiment to test whether talking to plants would help them to grow faster. The student talked to one gr

oup of plants and hand watered them. The student did not talk to the other group of plants and used sprinklers. After three weeks, the plants that were spoken to showed much more growth than the plants that were not. Based on the results of this experiment, which is the best conclusion?
a)Talking to plants may or may not help plants grow faster because three weeks is not enough time to tell.
B)Talking to plants may or may not help plants grow faster because the amount of water given was likely different for each group.
c)Talking to plants does not help plants grow faster because the experiment did not involve enough groups of plants to determine this.
D)Talking to plants does help plants grow faster because those plants showed more growth.


which is the best answer to pick hurry have a short amount of time on this test
Biology
2 answers:
anastassius [24]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is D. Good luck on your test!
saul85 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answer will be option-B.

Explanation:

The student performed the experiment to study the effect of talking to plants on the growth of plants. He wanted to study "talking as an experimental variable".

While experiment he divided the samples into control group as well as the experimental group but he mixed the other variables like watering the plants using various methods-directly or with sprinkles in different amount.

This mixing of variables will cause interference with the conclusion as one will not be able to suggest that the growth pattern in plants is the result of the talking or watering. Also, the amount of water as well as mode of providing water differed in the experimental group.

Thus, Option-B is the correct answer.

You might be interested in
A group of environmentalists were discussing the benefits and drawbacks associated with using fossil fuels. Which argument best
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative forms of energy

Explanation:

Fossil fuels are made from organic matter of dead animals and mainly plants  who were buried in the soil over hundred and thousand of years. We use fossil fuels because they are the best source to provide energy in the current time.

Fossil fuels are easily available and are present in very large amount which is the main reason for it to be cheaper. Fossil fuels like coal, petroleum or natural gas are more cheaper and efficient than alternative forms of energy like solar or wind energy.

But in future these fossil fuel will not be there and alternative forms of energy will become the primary and cheaper source of fuel.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How have freshwater and salt water fish adapted to deal with osmosis in their respective environments?
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Salt water fish are perfectly adapted to their salty environment and need osmosis to live. The replacement fluid taken on to replace the lost water is desalinated by a process known as diffusion. Diffusion allows fish to live in a state of constant osmosis

5 0
3 years ago
Punnett squares, are hard please help me.
Nitella [24]
Because A is dominant and there is two Aa alleles there is 50% of a soild<span />
5 0
4 years ago
Under what conditions would you expect to see a full moon?
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:

when the Moon has moved in its orbit so that Earth is “between” the Moon and the Sun.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Is a fossil a biotic or abiotic factor? Explain why or why not.*<br> 2 points<br> Your answer
olasank [31]

Answer:

I am not going to straight out give you the answer, because I believe you can figure the answer out yourself. Ask yourself is the fossil living (or once living) or not living? If the fossil <em>is </em>living or once lived, that would make it biotic. If the fossil is not alive, that would make it abiotic.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is a difference between starch and glycogen?
    11·2 answers
  • Most plantonic life in the ocean exists in an area that is very vulnerable to marine pollution. This area is called the ________
    6·2 answers
  • If a single mutation turned off the growth of some pairs of legs within an organism what's most likely affected?
    6·1 answer
  • You are standing at position X. Click on the diagram that shows your position when you perceive a sound at the same frequency as
    5·1 answer
  • The variables for this experiment include the number of each type of sprout, the average height of those sprouts, and the amount
    15·2 answers
  • Oncogenes are mutated forms of genes. Oncogenes can transform a normal cell into a tumor
    10·1 answer
  • The most general category a living thing is placed into a? <br> what are they placed into
    14·1 answer
  • Only scientists use model true or flase
    8·2 answers
  • What is the current ph level of the ocean​
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the relatively largest type of organism?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!