Answer: 64 units
Step-by-step explanation:
Remember, the formula to find surface area given radius is
. Let's add in the given information:
4pi4^2 =
4pi16
64pi!
Hope this helps, please consider making me Brainliest.
Answer: x=5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
![A^{-1}=\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} \frac{1}{9} & \frac{4}{27} & - \frac{2}{27} \\\\ \frac{8}{9} & \frac{5}{27} & \frac{11}{27} \\\\ - \frac{4}{9} & \frac{2}{27} & - \frac{1}{27} \end{array} \right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%5E%7B-1%7D%3D%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B9%7D%20%26%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B27%7D%20%26%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B27%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cfrac%7B8%7D%7B9%7D%20%26%20%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B27%7D%20%26%20%5Cfrac%7B11%7D%7B27%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B9%7D%20%26%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B27%7D%20%26%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B27%7D%20%5Cend%7Barray%7D%20%5Cright%5D)
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to find the inverse of ![A=\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & -2 \\\\ 4 & 1 & 3 \\\\ -4 & 2 & 3 \end{array} \right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3D%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%201%20%26%200%20%26%20-2%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%204%20%26%201%20%26%203%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20-4%20%26%202%20%26%203%20%5Cend%7Barray%7D%20%5Cright%5D)
To find the inverse matrix, augment it with the identity matrix and perform row operations trying to make the identity matrix to the left. Then to the right will be inverse matrix.
So, augment the matrix with identity matrix:
![\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1&0&-2&1&0&0 \\\\ 4&1&3&0&1&0 \\\\ -4&2&3&0&0&1\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Cccc%7D1%260%26-2%261%260%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%204%261%263%260%261%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20-4%262%263%260%260%261%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
- Subtract row 1 multiplied by 4 from row 2
![\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1&0&-2&1&0&0 \\\\ 0&1&11&-4&1&0 \\\\ -4&2&3&0&0&1\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Cccc%7D1%260%26-2%261%260%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%261%2611%26-4%261%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20-4%262%263%260%260%261%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
- Add row 1 multiplied by 4 to row 3
![\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1&0&-2&1&0&0 \\\\ 0&1&11&-4&1&0 \\\\ 0&2&-5&4&0&1\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Cccc%7D1%260%26-2%261%260%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%261%2611%26-4%261%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%262%26-5%264%260%261%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
- Subtract row 2 multiplied by 2 from row 3
![\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1&0&-2&1&0&0 \\\\ 0&1&11&-4&1&0 \\\\ 0&0&-27&12&-2&1\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Cccc%7D1%260%26-2%261%260%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%261%2611%26-4%261%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%260%26-27%2612%26-2%261%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
![\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1&0&-2&1&0&0 \\\\ 0&1&11&-4&1&0 \\\\ 0&0&1&- \frac{4}{9}&\frac{2}{27}&- \frac{1}{27}\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Cccc%7D1%260%26-2%261%260%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%261%2611%26-4%261%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%260%261%26-%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B9%7D%26%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B27%7D%26-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B27%7D%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
- Add row 3 multiplied by 2 to row 1
![\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1&0&0&\frac{1}{9}&\frac{4}{27}&- \frac{2}{27} \\\\ 0&1&11&-4&1&0 \\\\ 0&0&1&- \frac{4}{9}&\frac{2}{27}&- \frac{1}{27}\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Cccc%7D1%260%260%26%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B9%7D%26%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B27%7D%26-%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B27%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%261%2611%26-4%261%260%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%260%261%26-%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B9%7D%26%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B27%7D%26-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B27%7D%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
- Subtract row 3 multiplied by 11 from row 2
![\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1&0&0&\frac{1}{9}&\frac{4}{27}&- \frac{2}{27} \\\\ 0&1&0&\frac{8}{9}&\frac{5}{27}&\frac{11}{27} \\\\ 0&0&1&- \frac{4}{9}&\frac{2}{27}&- \frac{1}{27}\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Cccc%7D1%260%260%26%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B9%7D%26%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B27%7D%26-%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B27%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%261%260%26%5Cfrac%7B8%7D%7B9%7D%26%5Cfrac%7B5%7D%7B27%7D%26%5Cfrac%7B11%7D%7B27%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%200%260%261%26-%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7B9%7D%26%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B27%7D%26-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B27%7D%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
As can be seen, we have obtained the identity matrix to the left. So, we are done.
Answer:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.