Answer:
no
Explanation:
most psychologists are skeptical of ESP and believe it's not real. There actually more skeptical of ESP than other scientists.
Answer:
The length of cable is 12.5 m
Explanation:
Since, the wrecking ball completes 1 oscillation, in the same time, as it takes for the rock to complete 5 oscillations.
Therefore,
Time Period of Wrecking Ball = 5 (Time Period of Rock)
Since,
Time Period of Pendulum = 2π√(L/g)
Therefore,
2π√(L₁/g) = 5[2π√(L₂/g)]
√L₁ = 5√L₂
Squaring on both sides:
L₁ = 25 L₂
where,
L₁ = Length of Cable = ?
L₂ = Length of string = 0.5 m
Therefore,
L₁ = 25 (0.5 m)
<u>L₁ = 12.5 m</u>
The y-axis of the speed-time graph is the speed while the x-axis is the time of travel. In this case, the slope is equal to the change in y over change in x. Change in y is velocity difference while change in x is time difference. Since v<span>elocity difference/ t</span><span>ime difference is the slope, the answer is acceleration. </span>
Answer:
B) weather conditions that cannot be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than
Explanation:
Option B obeys the principle of parallelism because the two phrases, " can be carefully planned" and "cannot be foreseen" follow the same grammatical structure. Option A does not obey parallelism because " can be carefully planned" and "could not be foreseen" do not follow the same grammatical structure.
The phrase " they had anticipated" in the other options apart from B do not have a matching subject. Pilot errors is the subject in this sentence and it is not expected to anticipate anything, only the pilots can.
Moreover, "that cannot be foreseen" is more parallel to "can be carefully planned" that "unforeseeable" or "foreseeable" used in the other options
True. Light can be described both as flow of particles and as an electromagnetic wave.
