Answer:
21.00d+0.10m<=115.00
Step-by-step explanation:
d=days m=miles it must be less than or equal to 115 dollars
Answer:
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 300
p = 5% = 0.05
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of dead pixels , x = 24
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from excel.
P-value = 0.00856
Since the p-value is smaller than the significance level, we fail to accept the null hypothesis and reject it. We accept the alternate hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the true proportion of monitors with dead pixels is greater than 5%.
Answer:
Between each pair of points are coordinates K(x1,y1) F(x2, y2)
Distance KF =sqrt( (x2 - x1) ² + (y2 - y1) ²)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
5280 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
one loop is 1 fourth of a mile
she walked 4 times, making it a full mile.
So, she walked 5,280 feet in total
204.79
Step-by-step explanation: