Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer:
Sports players: For people that need high respiratory performance, rises in the pressure may difficult the things, so they would be affected by high pressure because this makes breathing a little bit harder.
Workers in construction and such: People that work a lot with their muscles, in heat environments (road workers, construction workers) may be affected by the same problem as before, and this makes the workers to exhaust in a shorter time than if they worked in a lower pressure environment.
Scientist: A lot of time, some experiments or investigations need a specific pressure to work, so changes in weather pressure may affect investigations, and because the changes are actually uncontrollable, the scientist are really affected by them.
The experimental probability of landing on heads is the same as the theoretical probability of landing on heads.
Your answer to the question is B) 7
