Explanation:
Hammurabi was quite harsh when it came to his code of law. Although the punishments as well as the limits were reasonable, the cruelity was demonstrated throughout the code of law. However, the most unfair and unreasonable laws, in my opinion, consisted of long-term suffering. For example, if a physician accidently failed an operation and tragically killed his patient, Hammurabi would lacerate the physician's hands, ensuring that that physician will not make the same terrible mistake again. These laws were not merciful whatsoever, but Hammurabi's punishments and limits that he set in his kingdom kept things in order. After all, the empire did fall apart after Hammurabi's death.
The answer should be regular and fair.
That means that it everyone is able to have the same rights and the country is ruled by people, which is why elections are essential.
No, he was not hypocritical because he didn't allow slavery. With or without it, it wouldn't have had a big impact on his life so he didn't do it because it helped himself. He did because he had the kindness of heart.
Yes they did violate it. Even though the amendment was new in 1870 it clearly stated: prohibits the federal government and each state from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "RACE, COLOR, or previous condition of servitude."