High levels of knowing and willful (mis)conduct are what Richard Walker and others at the SEC have argued should be the factor that causes the leadership at an investigated company to "flaunt the law".
The correct answer is <span>D. refusing to testify against oneself in court.
According to the constitution, you don't have to incriminate yourself in the court of law and be a witness if you don't want to. Also, anything found in your house or similar that is not related in any way to the case cannot be used to prosecute you. Example of this was when p.ornography was found in the house of a suspect and she was accused of lewd behavior, even though it had nothing to do with the case that she was involved in.</span>
The answer is rule-governed behavior. This is quite a bit of human conduct depends on rules we gain from others or make ourselves. For instance, your great companion may abstain from touching a red burner on a stove since somebody disclosed to her she would get copied on the off chance that she did. That is, she could have learned and taken after an administer about touching red burners.
Answer:
2. representative democracy
Explanation:
Answer:
They had to share the responsibilities of ranching, farming and domestic upkeep more than ever before.
Explanation:
Men and women were considered equal in capabilities and skills in every field in the West. They were treated equally and were provided with opportunities equally with men.
In the West, there were no control of anyone that divide the two sexes -- men and women. The government give equal rights and equal responsibilities were been shared by the two. Both men and women are responsible for farming or ranching. Both did domestic up-keeping together more than before.
