Answer:
Answer is given below.
Explanation:
it is absolutely exploitative to adjust the maturing of the records receivable with no legitimate explanation so as to diminish the remittance made so as to expand the benefit and show an off base monetary record figures to the partners. The controller can't subjectively choose to change the records receivable to cut down the noncollectable records as at some point or another a similar will be found during review and a similar will be hailed off as a fake. The long haul results you would confront incorporate landing terminated from the position, having your authorized dropped in the event that you are CPA and may likewise confront lawful prosecutions. You should disclose to the controller that so as to simply introduce a decent benefit for the present year it can place into the danger for the future and put their vocation in question. Additionally, a similar won't be valued by the investors and the organization may go on free its altruism.
It is true that departmentalization by location allows an organization to readily respond to the unique demands of each geographical area.
The departmentalization by location is a strategy that organizations use to maintain departments in different locations where they operate, in order to deal more closely with the company's activities and needs.
This is a positive strategy that can speed up decision making, as each geographic area has different needs that must be addressed differently from the other.
So the statement is true and some of the advantages of departmentalization by location is improved communication, better allocation of employees and greater product promotion.
Learn more about departmentalization here:
brainly.com/question/6229273
Answer:
The production of the clocks should be continued, as buy option will increase the cost for the company by 48,000
Explanation:
Current escenario
100 DM x 1,200 = 120,000
140 DL x 1,200 = 168,000
80 VO x 1,200 = 96,000
Fixed Cost 150 x 1,200 = 180,000
Total cost = 564,000
420 x 1,200 = 504,000
60% fixed cost unavoudable 180,00 = 108,000
Total Cost 612,000
make 564,000
buy (612,000)
total cost saving (48,000)
Answer:
Karl Marx
Explanation:
Karl Marx was a German economist that lived in the 19th century. His definition of capital as the most important factor of production was actually quite accurate and advanced for his time. He was the first major economist to state that capital by itself was enough to generate wealth.
He also proposed socialism as the higher stage of capitalism, which actually works in many European nations which are considered social democracies, e.g. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Germany, etc., and at the same have the highest standards of living in the world.
Personally, I believe that his major flaw was to go a few steps further and believe in communism and that it would solve all of humanity's problems. Communism is not the same of socialism, since socialism believes in an economy under the influence of the state but also supports individual merit and private property. E.g. someone that works hard should be paid more, i.e. personal wealth is not bad. On the other hand, communism believes that the state must control the economy and that individuals should be rewarded based on their needs, not their work. It doesn't matter if you work hard or not even work at all, the state must satisfy your needs.
Answer:
15 and 20 feet
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of the material minimized is shown below:
As we know that
Area of rectangle = Length × Width
where,
Length be X
Width be Y
So, the equation is
X × Y = 300 square feet
X = 300 ÷ Y
Now the another equation is
C = 10 × (Y + Y + X) + 5X
C = 20Y + 15X
So we can write
C = 20Y + 15 × 300 ÷ Y
C = 20Y + 4,500 ÷ Y
Now apply the derivatives
So,
DC ÷ DY = 20 - 4,500 ÷ Y^2 = 0
20Y^2 = 4,500
Y = 15
So X = 20
The C = Cost
