The gaining of electron by an atom results in the formation of anion shown by the negative charge on the atom whereas lose of electron results in the formation of cation shown by positive charge on the atom. The atom lose or gain electron to complete their octet and get stable in nature.
The chlorine atom will gain an electron and form chloride anion with one negative charge on it. The chloride ion is more stable in nature compared to the chlorine atom due to complete octet of chloride ion by gaining of electron.
Electronic configuration of chlorine atom is:
![[Ne]3s^{2}3p^{5}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BNe%5D3s%5E%7B2%7D3p%5E%7B5%7D)
By gaining of one electron, electronic configuration of chloride ion is:
![[Ne]3s^{2}3p^{6}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BNe%5D3s%5E%7B2%7D3p%5E%7B6%7D)
Thus, the equation that shows the formation of the chloride ion from a neutral chlorine atom is:

Your answer to your question is: 1s² 2s² 2p⁶
It's unable to identify a decrease in LOS linked to corticosteroid exposure during hospitalization for ocular cellulitis in this database search. After two days of hospitalization, operational episodes and the prescription of corticosteroids were related to admission to the PICU.
Within two days of admission, 1347 (24%) of the 5462 children who were included in the research received a corticosteroid prescription. In analyses that controlled for age, the existence of meningitis, abscess, or visual problems, as well as the surgical episode and PICU admission within 2 days, corticosteroid prescription was not linked with LOS (e = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.06). Among patients with a primary diagnosis of orbital cellulitis, corticosteroid exposure was linked to surgical events after two days of hospitalization (odds ratio = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.29-3.27) and 30-day readmission (odds ratio = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.52-3.78). Prospective, randomized control trials are required prior to the widespread usage of corticosteroids.
Learn more about orbital cellulitis here:-
brainly.com/question/15572218
#SPJ4
I believe it's 6789 times 10^4. I could be wrong, due to the fact that I don't remember what's the definition of the scientific notion. I hope this helps, or at least gives you an idea! :D