Should the hypothesis always be correct for a conclusion

1 answer:

4 0

No it shouldn't, a hypothesis doesn't need to be correct but must have an idea for why x variable effects y variable and have good reasoning. In the conclusion you should state if it's correct or not and explain why it's correct/incorrect and what answer you've determined from data.

You might be interested in

A recipe for a sweet tea calls for 3 cups of sugar when you place a sugar into the tea it doesn't dissolve. How could you use di

barxatty [35]

Answer: You could dissolve it by heating it back up, then just cooling it down again.

Hope that helps!

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What was the greatest contribution of the monasteries? A. Illuminated manuscripts. B. Cloisters. C. Sculpture.d. Transepts

REY [17]

I am not entirely sure but i believe the answer is C scupture

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

At standard temperature and pressure, carbon dioxide has a density of 1.98 kg/m3. What volume does 1.70 kg of carbon dioxide occ

nikitadnepr [17]

Answer:

<h2>volume= 0.85m^3</h2>

Explanation:

<em>The density of a substance is defined as the mass per unit volume of the substance, the unit is in kg/m^3 and it is represented by the greek letter rho</em>

Step one:

given data

we are told that the density of Co2= 1.98 kg/m3

and the mass of Co2 is= 1.70 kg

we know the relation between mass, volume and density is

$density=mass/volume$