6 67 10 hope this help :)
It’s false, just rewrite the statement but change the final part where it says the inverse also contains the point “(r,q)” as that’s wrong it would be the point (q,r)
Yes that is true because -3=3 so -3 is less
Answer:
First city: $5,500
Second city: $5,000
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's define x as the hotel price in the first city and y the hotel price in the second city. We can start with this equation:
y = x - 500 (The hotel before tax in the 2nd city was $500 lower than in the 1st.)
Then we can say
0.065x + 0.045y = 582.50 (the sum of the tax amounts were $582.50)
We place the value of y from the first equation in the second equation:
0.065x + 0.045 (x - 500) = 582.50
0.065x + 0.045x - 22.50 = 582.50 (simplifying and adding 22.5 on each side)...
0.11x = 605
x = 5,500
The cost of the first hotel was $5,500
Thus, the cost of the second hotel was $5,000 (x - 500)
Answer:
(D)What did Micah eat for lunch yesterday?
Step-by-step explanation:
A statistical question is a question for which the expected response varies. That is, we do not expect to get a single answer. Out of the given options,
Option D is not a valid statistical question as the response to the question will always be the same for a particular day,
If Micah ate cheesecakes for lunch yesterday, asking repeated times will not change the response.