1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marysya [2.9K]
3 years ago
9

Answer correctly for a brainliest I promise I will give you one of its correct

Mathematics
1 answer:
-Dominant- [34]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is 20 because you have to do the slope formula
You might be interested in
Dinner $50 with 18% tip
Mashutka [201]
18 percent of $50 is $9.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By graphing the system of constraints, find the values o f x and y that minimize the objective function.
svet-max [94.6K]

Graph the inequalities to find the vertices of the shaded region: (2, 3) and (8, 0).

Now, evaluate the the function C = x + 3y at those vertices to find the minimum value.

C = x + 3y at (2, 3)  ⇒  C = (2) + 3(3)   ⇒  C = 2 + 9   ⇒   C = 11

C = x + 3y at (8, 0)  ⇒  C = (8) + 3(0)   ⇒  C = 8 + 0   ⇒   C = 8

The minimum value occurs at (8, 0) with a minimum of C = 8

Answer: A

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the slope in the equation y=2x + 3?
olasank [31]

Answer:

the answer is m = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Try using Symbolab, I use it all the time it gives the correct answer and it gives good explanations.

hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drag and drop the answer into the box to identify each function as linear, exponential, or neither.
katrin2010 [14]
<span>​x​ 2 3 4
f(x) 5.5 7 8.5 </span>

The first function is linear. When you subtract 5.5 from 7, you get 1.5 and when you subtract 7 from 8.5 you also get 1.5. That's how we know it's a linear function because there's clearly pattern. HOWEVER, if you had 5.5, 7, and 9 that would not be a linear function. Why? Because when you take away 7 from 9 you get 2. In order for it to be a linear function you have to get the same exact number when you subtract. 

<span>x​ 0 3 6
f(x) 1 8 64</span> 

The second function is exponential because when you divide you get the exact same number. 8/1 = 8 and 64/8 = 8. So this is exponential. But if you had 72 instead of 64 it would not be an exponential function because there has to be a pattern. 

I hope this makes sense. Btw I had this question on my test too and this is correct. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
X
KatRina [158]

Answer:

B (2,6,10,14)

Step-by-step explanation:

I think C and D are imposible to be the answer.

A and B are 50% to be the answer.

But I choose B.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find a formula for the general term of the sequence, assuming that the pattern of the first few terms continues. 2, 9, 16, 23
    14·2 answers
  • Find the measure of the angle between two forces of 30 pounds and 35 pounds if the magnitude of their resultant is 42 pounds
    8·2 answers
  • A used car dealership buys a car for 2600 and then sells it for 4100 what is the price increase
    11·2 answers
  • If 6x +3= 2x+ 19, then x =
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP I GIVE BRAINIEST
    10·1 answer
  • Find the height of an equilateral triangle with side length 8.
    6·2 answers
  • Jeremiah buys 3 lbs of cheese at $3.50
    7·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP
    15·2 answers
  • 2 lb 2 oz - 1 lb 4 oz
    12·2 answers
  • The depth of a pond changes from 8 2/5 m to 5 1/2 m over a period of 1 2/3 mo.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!