Answer: The results of Rutherford's gold foil experiment gave him the evidence to arrive at two conclusions: (1) an atom was much more than just empty space and scattered electrons and (2) an atom consists of a positive charge at the center where most of its mass is placed.
Explanation:
Ernest Rutherford performed an experiment in which he passed alpha particles through a thin gold foil sheet. Through this sheet some of the particles passed on to the other side but some of them were reflected back.
This experiment was done by Rutherford to prove than an atom contains a tiny and heavy nucleus. He concluded that an atom has more than empty space and electrons were present in scattered form.
Also, he concluded that an atom consists of a positive charge at the center where most of its mass is placed.
Thus, we can conclude that the results of Rutherford's gold foil experiment gave him the evidence to arrive at two conclusions: (1) an atom was much more than just empty space and scattered electrons and (2) an atom consists of a positive charge at the center where most of its mass is placed.
Answer:
With less energy at higher trophic levels, there are usually fewer organisms as well
Explanation: Organisms tend to be larger in size at higher trophic levels, but their smaller numbers result in less biomass. Biomass is the total mass of organisms at a trophic level.
It should be organized in people
Answer:
Please find the structure attached as an image
Explanation:
Based on the characteristics ending name (-ene) of the organic compound above, it belongs to the ALKENE GROUP. Alkenes are characterized by the possession of a carbon to carbon double bond (C=C) in their structure.
- But-3-ene tells us that the organic compound has four straight carbon atoms with the C=C (double bond) located on the THIRD carbon depending on if we count from right to left or vice versa.
- 2 methyl indicates that the methyl group (-CH3) is located as an attachment on the second carbon (carbon 2).
N.B: In the structure attached below, the counting is from the left to right (→).
1.
-Water levels are dangerously high for wildlife and humans.
-Animals seem to be lost, like the cow and the sheep especially.
2.
-There are not many trees near the water, meaning less areas for wildlife to live.
-There is not much wildlife in general.
Inferences
1. The wildlife shown will move relocate and adapt to another area.
2. Industry — emissions are visible in top left— will continue to hurt the environment. CO2 emissions will increase.
Good luck!
