Let

. Then

and

are two fundamental, linearly independent solution that satisfy


Note that

, so that

. Adding

doesn't change this, since

.
So if we suppose

then substituting

would give

To make sure everything cancels out, multiply the second degree term by

, so that

Then if

, we get

as desired. So one possible ODE would be

(See "Euler-Cauchy equation" for more info)
To solve an equation for one variable, we will utilize PEMDAS ( parentheses, exponents, multiplication/division, add/subtract) but backwards. So we will first add/subtract any numbers to the other side to get the variable by itself. We will then divide/multiply any numbers to get the variable by itself.
Answer:
SSS
Step-by-step explanation:
Well, the picture says asks why the triangles are congruent but your question asks why they aren't congruent, so I will just assume that you made a typo, and you really meant: "Which rule explains why these triangles are congruent?"
Well, the triangles have two congruent sides, and they have a common shared side that are both congruent (due to reflexive property), so the triangle theorem SSS (Side-Side-Side) proves that the triangles are both congruent.
11 - (-5) = 16. Hope that helped!
<span>Identify the known ratio and the unknown ratio.Set up the proportion.Cross-multiply and solve.Check answer by plugging result into unknown ratio. Look here for the formula: </span>http://prntscr.com/e0qtq3