Answer: D. There was a one-way flow of wealth favoring the colonizers.
Explanation:
With the Colonists simply taking resources and not paying the colonies for it, there was a one way flow of wealth which favored them alone. Had the colonists paid for the goods and then processed them for resale (as developed countries do now), there would have been at least some sort of wealth flowing back to the colonies for the resources they possessed. The Colonists were essentially not paying for raw material inputs for production and simply reaped all the benefits after processing.
Answer:
d. 81
Explanation:
E(number of order) = E(X1) + E(X2) + 21 -4
= 12 + 12 + 17
= 41
Therefore, The store should order 81 .
Purely domestic firms will be at a disadvantage to men's in the event of market disequilibria because domestic firms lack comparative data from its own sources.
<h3>What are domestic firms?</h3>
Most or all of the operations of domestic companies are conducted within the US. They might export goods or import supplies, but these activities often make up a modest portion of overall corporate activity. US securities regulations primarily apply to domestic enterprises. Typically, their financial reports are created using widely accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
To know more about domestic firms visit:
brainly.com/question/13770538
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>projects</u>
Explanation:
Remember, among the 'Project selection' stage is the first stage of the Project Process Stages. This stage typically involves examining each project and then determining which is of utmost importance.
Rather than trying to run every uncompleted project with the limited resources available which may affect the status of other projects, it is better to select the project that is most beneficial and that is feasible to complete within the stipulated deadline.
Answer:
Ten pounds of chicken to trade for at least <u>40</u> pounds of vegetables but not more than<u> 50</u> pounds of vegetables
Explanation:
Vegetables Chicken Trade Off Ratio
John 40 10 4:1 (40/10) or 1:0.25 (10/40)
George 25 5 5:1 (25/5) or 1:0.20 (5/25)
John has comparative advantage in Chicken and George has comparative advantage in Veggies because :
- John's chicken opportunity cost, in veggies < George (4<5). George's veggies opportunity cost, in chicken < John (0.20<0.25).
- George is more (5X) productive in veggies than chicken, than John (4X). John is less unproductive in chicken than veggies (1/4th), compared to George (1/5th).
So, John will sell Chicken to George & George will sell veggies to John. Gains from trade are when each get trade ratio better than their their own trade off ratio.
- It implies: John gets >' 4 pounds veggies per chicken pound' and George gets > '0.20 pound chicken per veggie pound'.
- Unitary method:- '1chicken : 4veggies' = '10chickens : 40veggies' and '0.20chicken : 1veggie' = '10chickens : 50 veggies' .