Schenck v. United States 1919 was a landmark decision case that helped to define the limits and reaches of the First Amendment when it pertains to the right to free speech during wartime.
This decision provided further clarity when pertaining to when the government is allowed to limit free speech.
Charles Schenck was arrested for distributing flyers that urged young men to resist the draft. Shenck was found guilty of performing disloyal acts and being dangerous to national security.
Answer:
Most states require that all electoral votes go to the candidate who receives the most votes in that state. After state election officials certify the popular vote of each state, the winning slate of electors meet in the state capital and cast two ballots—one for Vice President and one for President. Electors cannot vote for a Presidential and Vice Presidential candidate who both hail from an elector’s home state. For instance, if both candidates come from New York, New York’s electors may vote for one of the candidates, but not both. In this hypothetical scenario, however, Delaware’s electors may vote for both New York candidates. This requirement is a holdover from early American history when one of the country’s major political fault lines divided big states from small states. The founders hoped this rule would prevent the largest states from dominating presidential elections.
Explanation:
Hope this helps if not sorry
I believe the answer is B. The French and Indian was fought between Britain and France. A is incorrect because the French and Native Americans actually became allies during this war. C is incorrect because the colonies are run by European colonial powers. American Indian usually didn't fight over competition because they shared mostly everything.
Roads, unless you have some options I could see?
