- The expression was rewritten using the commutative law of addition.
- Line 1 says 3 + 4, which could be represented using dots as ••• + •••• for a total of 7 dots.
- Line 2 says 4 + 3, which could be represented using dots as •••• + ••• for a total of 7 dots.
<h3>What is the
commutative law of addition?</h3>
The commutative law of addition is also referred to as the law of cumulative addition and it states that if two numbers are added together, then, the outcome is equal to the addition of their interchanged position because addition is considered as a binary operation.
This ultimately implies that, the sum of addends would always be the same (equal) regardless of their arrangement in accordance with the commutative law of addition. Mathematically, the commutative law of addition can be represented using the following formula:
A + B = B + A.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the given expression was rewritten using the commutative law of addition.
In conclusion, Line 1 says 3 + 4, which could be represented using dots as ••• + •••• for a total of 7 dots. Line 2 says 4 + 3, which could be represented using dots as •••• + ••• for a total of 7 dots.
Read more on commutative law of addition here: brainly.com/question/778086
#SPJ1
Answer:
80
Step-by-step explanation:
78 is only 2 from 80 while it is 8 from 70
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
That would be false because parallel lines don't intersect. But i can if one is straight and the other is Curved
27 times 27
7 times 2,401
1,000,000,000 divided by 10,000,000
390,625 divided by 5
hope this helps!!
