Emerging adult Erum is a heavy social media user. This may strengthen/lead more to face-to-face friendships.
Erum's heavy usage of social media implies his engaging, interacting capacity with people, moreover strangers. All these signs indicate towards him being an extrovert which implies he can communicate more easily with people around him, thus, increasing friendships.
Further, social media provided him with more friends to interact personally with and build face-to-face friendships, also his conversing skills would have been furbished through this habit.
Whereas, a nonuser i.e. a person who doesn't use social media much tends to be isolated from the world outside and implies to be an introvert, thus fewer face-to-face interactions for him.
To learn who is an extrovert, click here brainly.com/question/7375078
#SPJ4
Medieval obtained wealth from land renaissance obtained wealth from trade. (hope I helped) :))
Abstract art is popular because it has a purpose in this world both for the artist and the viewer. Many people collect abstract paintings to beautify their surroundings, as an investment, or to update their lives with contemporary culture. ... Abstract art also covers a broad spectrum of painting styles. Abstract art can also be made with many materials and on many surfaces. It can be used in concert with representational art or completely abstract. Artists creating it often focus on other visual qualities like color, form, texture, scale and more in their nonobjective work.
Answer:
Explanation:
The main similarity between political parties and interest groups is that they both seek to achieve certain policy objectives. These can be a broad range of policy objectives or only a relative few.
Political parties have a large number of policy objectives that they wish to achieve, whereas pressure groups tend to have only a few. Some pressure groups, such as those that campaign for the protection of the environment, are based around a single issue.
As such, pressure groups tend to have greater coherence than political parties, as it is much easier for their members to unite around a common single objective than a broad range of policies.
This helps to explain why pressure groups endeavor to bring about changes in policy without attaining political power. Their focus is so narrow that it would be virtually impossible for them to secure the kind of broad-based coalition that is essential in a democracy for a political party.
However, despite remaining outside of the formal democratic process, pressure groups—as their name implies—can still exert considerable pressure on policy-makers in order to get the changes that they seek.
Such changes are not always forthcoming, however, because political parties tend to be quite broad-based coalitions. This means that policy-makers need to take into consideration a broad range of stakeholders whose interests are often opposed to those of relevant pressure groups. As a consequence, any changes made by political parties in power tend not to be as bold or as radical as pressure groups, who don't have to deal with the necessary compromises of political power in a democracy, would like.
