Answer:
<h2><u>The amount paid to an employee was </u><u>
162</u></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2><u>The expression 12h + 30w Identifies the amount paid to an employee.</u></h2><h2><u>Let h represent hours and let w represent the total amount of g-wagons sold. </u></h2><h2><u>Since the question explains that an employee works 6 hours and sells 3 wagons, put h as h = 6 and w as w = 3. We would end up getting this equation. 12h + 30w = 12(6) + 30(3).</u></h2><h2><u>Now all you need to do is solve it.</u></h2><h2><u>left side = 72</u></h2><h2><u>right side = 90</u></h2><h2><u>
72 + 90 =</u><u> 162</u></h2>
Answer:9
Step-by-step explanation: im not really sure I kinda just guess and check, so like, 2/3 times 3 is 6/3 which is 2. so 6/2 is 3. 3 times 3 is nine.
The test statistic z will be equal to -0.946 and it shows that there is no significant difference in the proportion of rehires between full time and part time.
Given sample sizes of 833 and 386 and result of samples 434 and 189.

Proportion of full time=434/833=0.52
Proportion of part time=189/386=0.49.
Difference in proportion =0.52-0.49
TTF- i∈ rho=0
TTF+i∈ rho≠0.
Mean of difference=0.03
Z=(X-μ)/σ
σ=
=0.0317
σ=0.0317
z=(0-0.03)/0.0317
=-0.03/0.0317
=-0.317
p value will be =0.1736.
Because p value is greater than 0.01 so we will accept the null hypothesis which shows that there is no significant difference in the proportions.
Hence there is no significant difference in the proportion of rehires between full time and part time.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4