You must observe the object twice.
-- Look at it the first time, and make a mark where it is.
-- After some time has passed, look at the object again, and
make another mark at the place where it is.
-- At your convenience, take out your ruler, and measure the
distance between the two marks.
What you'll have is the object's "displacement" during that period
of time ... the distance between the start-point and end-point.
Technically, you won't know the actual distance it has traveled
during that time, because you don't know the route it took.
The lowest energy of electron in an infinite well is 1.2*10^-33J.
To find the answer, we have to know more about the infinite well.
<h3>What is the lowest energy of electron in an infinite well?</h3>
- It is given that, the infinite well having a width of 0.050 mm.
- We have the expression for energy of electron in an infinite well as,


- Thus, the lowest energy of electron in an infinite well is,

Thus, we can conclude that, the lowest energy of electron in an infinite well is 1.2*10^-33J.
Learn more about the infinite well here:
brainly.com/question/20317353
#SPJ4
Answer:
(E) a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible
Explanation:
The trade is one strong reflection for many weak reflections (and more dangerous near-Earth space travel).
None of the answer choices except the last one has anything to do with the effect of exploding a satellite. When you are arguing that exploding a satellite is ill conceived, you need to address specifically the effects of exploding the satellite.