Answer:
The resultant force would (still) be zero.
Explanation:
Before the 600-N force is removed, the crate is not moving (relative to the surface.) Its velocity would be zero. Since its velocity isn't changing, its acceleration would also be zero.
In effect, the 600-N force to the left and 200-N force to the right combines and acts like a 400-N force to the left.
By Newton's Second Law, the resultant force on the crate would be zero. As a result, friction (the only other horizontal force on the crate) should balance that 400-N force. In this case, the friction should act in the opposite direction with a size of 400 N.
When the 600-N force is removed, there would only be two horizontal forces on the crate: the 200-N force to the right, and friction. The maximum friction possible must be at least 200 N such that the resultant force would still be zero. In this case, the static friction coefficient isn't known. As a result, it won't be possible to find the exact value of the maximum friction on the crate.
However, recall that before the 600-N force is removed, the friction on the crate is 400 N. The normal force on the crate (which is in the vertical direction) did not change. As a result, one can hence be assured that the maximum friction would be at least 400 N. That's sufficient for balancing the 200-N force to the right. Hence, the resultant force on the crate would still be zero, and the crate won't move.
Answer: 1: (A) They allow electrons to move freely between them. 2: (C) they change their positions relative to one another.
Explanation:
Why does a satellite in a circular orbit travel at a constant speed? why does a satellite in a circular orbit travel at a constant speed? there is a force acting opposite to the direction of the motion of the satellite. there is no component of force acting along the direction of motion of the satellite. the net force acting on the satellite is zero. the gravitational force acting on the satellite is balanced by the centrifugal force acting on the satellite?
..b.25
Answer:
We can cause delamination.
Explanation:
The reason why is because the probability of causing delamination increase considerably when we use Hole-filling fasteners. If we use a typical rivet, these tends to expands in order to fill the hole.
If we analyze the force applied by the expanded rod will cause that the matrial will be deteriorated and will cause that the material to delaminate around the edges of the hole and we can cause possible control and no protection to the material.