Please help no has answered this is my 3rd re:ask question I wasted 50 points please someone help

Law

1 answer:

oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Hey, That is a really Good question. AS, a Proscutor, I would argue that the Minor driving and the Minors in the truck knew what they were doing. AS a judge I wouldn't hold back I would give them the Max in Jail depending on there age they will spend some years in Juvinile Jail until they turn 18. Once they turn 18 they will go to the Jail with the rest of the adults. Once they are moved to the other jail they will once again have another court date for the Judge to then decide if he/or she will allow them to have parol or make them finish their Sentance out. Most likely the Judge will give them 3 months for each DUI and 10 years for Each Manslaughter charge.

Explanation:

I hope this helps.

You might be interested in

Summarize Arizona v Evans

Strike441 [17]

Answer:

United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Liquidity is something of value that you own. True O False

ahrayia [7]

I think its true I hope it is correct

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

One of the most common research methods in criminology is which of the following?

Stels [109]

Participant observation I think hope this helps :)

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

rodikova [14]

Answer:

option a is the correct option

7 0

2 years ago

which rule of the federal rules of civil procedures requires expert witnesses to submit written reports

Fantom [35]

The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)

The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.

I hope this helps! :)

3 0

2 years ago