<h3>
Answer:</h3>
1100 mmHg
<h3>
General Formulas and Concepts:</h3>
<u>Math</u>
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
<u>Chemistry</u>
<u>Gas Laws</u>
<u>Stoichiometry</u>
- Using Dimensional Analysis
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
[Given] 1.5 atm
[Solve] mmHg
<u>Step 2: Identify Conversions</u>
1 atm = 760 mmHg
<u>Step 3: Convert</u>
- [DA] Set up:
- [DA] Multiply/Divide [Cancel out units]:
<u>Step 4: Check</u>
<em>Follow sig fig rules and round. We are given 2 sig figs.</em>
1140 mmHg ≈ 1100 mmHg
Answer:
- <u><em>Magnesium and fluorine.</em></u>
Explanation:
<em>Ionic compounds</em> are formed by the electrostatic attraction of cations and anions.
Cations, positive ions, are formed when atoms lose electrons, and anions, negative ions, are formed when atoms gain electrons.
When two different atoms have similar atraction for electrons (electronegativity) they will not donate to nor catch electrons from each other, so cations and anions will not be formed. Instead, the atoms would prefer to share electrons forming covalent bonds to complete their outermost shell (octet rule).
Then, in order to form ionic compounds the electronegativities have to substantially different. This situation does not happen between two nonmetal elements, which nitrogen and sulfur are. Then, you can predict safely that nitrogen and sulfur will not form an ionic compound.
Ionic compounds, then require the electronegativity difference that exist between some metals and nonmetals. Being magnesium an alkaline earth metal, its electronegativity is very low. On the other hand, fluorine the first element of the group 17, has the highest electronegativity of all the elements.Thus magnesium and fluorine will have enough electronegativity difference to justify the exchange of electrons, forming ions and, consequently, ionic compounds.
Answer/Explanation:
A theory has lots of scientific evidence to back it up. We know this to be true based on lots of different diseases and studies of their spread.
A hypothesis is more of a starting point - an educated guess based on limited evidence. It requires further testing before becoming a theory.
A law is something that can be generalized to lots of contexts, and is universal. Such as the law of thermodynamics.
Answer:
Isn't this like having enough energy to supply the world for centuries with just 1% of the sea's force?
Explanation:
I guess it's because the amount of energy in it can supply energy.
