1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MaRussiya [10]
3 years ago
14

The diagram shows the electric field lines around two charges. Based on the field lines, what is the best description of the cha

rges ?
A.) they are negative, and they repel
B.) the left is negative and the right is positive, so they attract.
C.) the left is positive and the right is negative, so they attract.
D.) they are positive, they repel

Physics
2 answers:
Aloiza [94]3 years ago
7 0
Charges are moving away from both charges. Similar charges repel which means that A.) they are negative, and they repel or <span>D.) they are positive, they repel</span>
bixtya [17]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer is <span>D.) they are positive, they repel.

The law of charges states that; like charges repel while unlike charges attract. 
</span>∴ The first conclusion we can make from the two charges is that they are like, the repel. 
<span>
Magnetic field lines moves from positive to negative. In the diagram it is clear that the fields are moving from the two charges. 

So therefore, the correct answer is that, the two charges are positive and they repel.</span>
You might be interested in
a ray of light incident on a mirror, at an angle of 45°. Another mirror is placed at an angle of 45° to the first ones as shown.
Gwar [14]

Answer:

If the ray of light is deflected by 45 degrees by the first mirror its total deflection by mirror (I) is 90 deg. (incident = 45 and exit ray equals 45 deg)

The second mirror will cause a net deflection of 90 degrees and the total deflection will be 180 deg or in opposite  direction to the  incident ray.

3 0
2 years ago
What is called the process of finding exact quantity of a substance?​
Tema [17]

Answer:

Measurement is called the process of finding exact quantity of a substances.

7 0
2 years ago
Which competition is the “ most important soccer competition in the world “ ?
Ganezh [65]
It would be B. The World Cup

Hope this helps

Have a great day/night
8 0
3 years ago
What is the frequency of radiation whose wavelength is 2.40 x 10-5 cm?
S_A_V [24]
<span>To begin, the formula for finding frequency when wavelength is known is "f = c / w" when c is the constant velocity (3 * 10^8 m/s). To convert the wavelength into a common form (m/s), it will have to be multiplied by 10^-2. This leaves the equation as "f = 3.0 * 10^8 / (2.4 * 10^-5 * 10^-2), or 2.4 * 10^-7. This gives 1.25 * 10^15 m/s as the frequency.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
How would improvement in use of renewable energy sources impact climate change sea-level rise?
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Almost immeasurably small.

Explanation:

The STORY is that humans are BAD for the environment and have caused a HUGE change in the amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere.

Let's look at the reports and draw our own conclusions.

Current CO₂ levels are 409.8 parts per million (PPM)

at the beginning of the Industrial revolution in the 1700's, the presumed beginning of the huge increase in CO₂ the level was about 280 PPM

For perspective lets assume we capture the whole atmosphere and squish it down to 2400 one liter bottles of air

That's 100 cases of 24 bottles per case.

We now separate all the air components into their own bottles

Nitrogen is 78% of our air, so we subtract 78 cases from our 100 leaving 22

Subtracting Oxygen at 21% of air leaves 1 case of liter bottles left

Of those 24 bottles, Argon makes up 0.93% of air so we subtract 22 bottles

The remaining two bottles contain all of the other gasses in our air, One of those bottles contains CO₂.

If we take the CO₂ levels from the 1700's at about 280 PPM as a baseline and assume ALL of the increase is human caused, that is (410 -280) / 280 = 46 % of the total.

The human caused addition of CO₂ would be 460 mililiters out of 2400 liters over the course of 250 years 

The claim is, that less than half of a liter of CO₂ out of 2400 liters of air is responsible for heating not only the gas in all the other bottles but also the surface of the earth itself.

Personally, it boggles my mind.

And it says NOTHING of a far more powerful greenhouse gas that is far more prevalent in the atmosphere...water vapor.

Water vapor is about 1% of air at sea level and about 0.4% overall. It was not considered in the above analysis because water vapor can condense out and is not a constant in the air.

Notice that there is about 100 times the amount of water vapor in the air as compared to CO₂. Water vapor also has between 4 and 8 times the greenhouse effect that CO₂ does.

Makes one wonder why we choose to pick on CO₂.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • each experiences an attractive force of 3.7 N. The spheres are then touched together and moved back to a distance r apart. Find
    5·1 answer
  • In which situation is work being done?
    14·1 answer
  • A uniform shelf 1.8 meters long with mass 15 kg is mounted by a small hinge on a wall. The beam is held in a horizontal position
    6·1 answer
  • True or False: Unlike a fixed pulley, a moveable pulley multiplies the input force
    15·1 answer
  • Which statement about atmospheric pressure near earth's surface is true
    6·1 answer
  • Which graph shows uniform motion.​
    11·2 answers
  • Which is a property of bases?
    8·2 answers
  • ​A hose, of radius 0.018 m, is connected to a water faucet. The water pressure at the point where the hose connects to the fauce
    11·1 answer
  • Calculate the weight of a 2kg chicken on earth. .. (use the formulas)​
    7·1 answer
  • The two forces to the right are friction which one would be the force of kinetic friction?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!