1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
morpeh [17]
3 years ago
5

A larger glass has 100 mL of a liquid and a smaller glass has 50 mL of a liquid. Which glass of liquid would have more energy?

Chemistry
1 answer:
sukhopar [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:Calculations must be done first because energy depends on both temperature and mass.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How many orbitals are in the n=3 level
solniwko [45]

The third shell has 3 subshells: the subshell, which has 1 orbital with 2 electrons, the subshell, which has 3 orbitals with 6 electrons, and the subshell, which has 5 orbitals with 10 electrons, for a total of 9 orbitals and 18 electrons.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many particles are in 23 g of H 2 O?
Sedaia [141]
1 mole of any substance contains 6.022 × 1023 particles.

⚛ 6.022 × 1023 is known as the Avogadro Number or Avogadro Constant and is given the symbol NA

N = n × NA

· N = number of particles in the substance

· n = amount of substance in moles (mol)

· NA = Avogardro Number = 6.022 × 10^23 particles mol-1


For H2O we have:

2 H at 1.0 each = 2.0 amu
1 O at 16.0 each = 16.0 amu
Total for H2O = 18.0 amu, or grams/mole

It takes 18 grams of H2O to obtain 1 mole, or 6.02 x 1023 molecules of water. Think about that before we answer the question. We have 25.0 grams of water, so we have more than one mole of water molecules. To find the exact number, divide the available mass (25.0g) by the molar mass (18.0g/mole). Watch how the units work out. The grams cancel and moles moves to the top, leaving moles of water. [g/(g/mole) = moles].

Here we have 25.0 g/(18.0g/mole) = 1.39 moles water (3 sig figs).

Multiply 1.39 moles times the definition of a mole to arrive at the actual number of water molecules:

1.39 (moles water) * 6.02 x 1023 molecules water/(mole water) = 8.36 x 1023 molecules water.

That's slightly above Avogadro's number, which is what we expected. Keeping the units in the calculations is annoying, I know, but it helps guide the operations and if you wind up with the unit desired, there is a good chance you've done the problem correctly.

N = n × (6.022 × 10^23)


1 grams H2O is equal to 0.055508435061792 mol.

Then 23 g of H2O is 1.2767 mol


To calculate the number of particles, N, in a substance:

N = n × NA

N = 1.2767 × (6.022 × 10^23)

N= 176.26

N=
3 0
2 years ago
Prove that PV = nRT.​
qaws [65]

Find your answer in the explanation below.

Explanation:

PV = nRT is called the ideal gas equation and its a combination of 3 laws; Charles' law, Boyle's law and Avogadro's law.

According to Boyle's law, at constant temperature, the volume of a gas is inversely proportional to the pressure. i.e V = 1/P

From, Charles' law, we have that volume is directly proportional to the absolute temperature of the gas at constant pressure. i.e V = T

Avogadro's law finally states that equal volume of all gases at the same temperature and pressure contain the same number of molecules. i.e V = n

Combining the 3 Laws together i.e equating volume in all 3 laws, we have

V = nT/P,

V = constant nT/P

(constant = general gas constant = R)

V = RnT/P

by bringing P to the LHS, we have,

PV = nRT.

Q.E.D

6 0
3 years ago
A researcher claims that an ancient scroll originated from greek scholars in about 500 bce. a measure of its carbon-14 decay rat
Naddik [55]
The amount of substance present in a certain object with a given half-life in terms of h can be expressed through the equation,

     A(t) = (A(o))(0.5)^(t/h)

where A(t) is the amount of substance after t years and A(o) is the original amount. In this item we are given that A(t)/A(o) is equal to 0.89. Substituting the known values,

     0.89 = (0.5)(t / 5730 years)

The value of t from the equation is 963.34 years.

<em>Answer: 963 years</em>
8 0
3 years ago
If the bag was made from a metal (like sturdy aluminum foil), do you think it would lose its heat faster or slower than the plas
Luden [163]

I think it would lose its heat faster than the plastic bags because of higher conductivity feature.

<h3>What is conduction?</h3>

Conduction is the process in which heat or electricity is transmitted or transferred through the material of a substance without movement of the material.

We know that metals are good conductors so we can conclude that it would lose its heat faster than the plastic bags bof higher conductivity feature.

Learn more about heat here: brainly.com/question/13439286

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!!! Which is a correct statement of Newton's second law? Question 1 options: Every action has an equal and opposite
    6·2 answers
  • A solution of HCl has H+ = 0.01 M. What is the pH of this solution?–2, –1 ,1 ,2
    13·2 answers
  • Is flammability an example of physical property
    12·2 answers
  • Hector claims that a single sodium ion and a single oxygen ion do not bond together to form a stable binary ionic compound. Is h
    12·2 answers
  • Many portable gas heaters and grills use propane, C3H8.
    6·1 answer
  • A sample of an unknown compound is vaporized at 130°C . The gas produced has a volume of 1280mL at a pressure of 1.00 atm and it
    8·1 answer
  • Which statements describe the fossil record? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!
    10·2 answers
  • Density and Years: What do you know?Objectives: determine and compare density of pennies to assess composition. Procedure:1. Rea
    8·1 answer
  • Hi i will give brainliest to whoever answers this, thank you
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!