What is the stratosphere, mesosphere, and the thermosphere

Chemistry

1 answer:

alexgriva [62]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

stratosphere - The stratosphere is a layer of Earth's atmosphere. It is the second layer of the atmosphere as you go upward.

mesosphere - The mesosphere is a layer of Earth's atmosphere. The mesosphere is directly above the stratosphere and below the thermosphere

thermosphere - The thermosphere is a layer of Earth's atmosphere. The thermosphere is directly above the mesosphere and below the exosphere.

You might be interested in

PLZZ HELP!!!

pashok25 [27]

The sun evaporates the water from a stream or some type of water source and it then gets collected into the clouds and then condensation and the last step is when the water is too heavy so the clouds release it and that is called precipitation. hope this helps.

5 0

4 years ago

The ____________ in a chemical reaction is completely used up.

soldi70 [24.7K]

The answer is A reactant

7 0

3 years ago

Pls help

navik [9.2K]

The Cambrian period, part of the Paleozoic era, produced the most intense burst of evolution ever known. The Cambrian Explosion saw an incredible diversity of life emerge, including many major animal groups alive today. Among them were the chordates, to which vertebrates (animals with backbones) such as humans belong. These included brachiopods, which lived in shells resembling those of clams or cockles, and animals with jointed, external skeletons known as arthropods—the ancestors of insects, spiders, and crustaceans. These toughened-up creatures represented a crucial innovation: hard bodies offering animals both a defense against enemies and a framework for supporting bigger body sizes.

3 0

3 years ago

The first four electrons shells fill out in what electron configuration?

Sidana [21]

Explanation:

2, 8, 8, 2 is the electron arrangement of Calcium.

The way that the "orbitals", the shells, fill up is given as

$1s^{2} 2s^{2} 2p^{6} 3s^{2} 3p^{6} 4s^{2} 3d^{10}$ . . . etc etc.

It is more stable for the fourth shell to start filling up with an electron pair, and then subsequent electrons filling up the third shell again.

So while potassium 19, is 2,8,8,1

And calcium 20, is 2,8,8,2

Scandium 21 will fill up as, 2,8,9,2

This will continue until we reach Zinc 30, which will fill up as 2,8,18,2. The third shell is now "full", and the fourth shell will now being to fill up.

The fourth orbital starts getting filled up again, Gallium 31, is 2,8,18,3

3 0

2 years ago

Why is it important to choose a relevant scale for analyzing data sets in science?

alexdok [17]

<h3>Explanation;</h3>

<h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."</h2><h2 /><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.</h2><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.</h2><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.The fitness tracker data wasnt available a few years back, so more data is probably going to change the data, especially once the adoption moves from the early adopters (tech and fitness geeks) to other people - old people. kids etc - bet there is not much data related to them.</h2><h2 /><h2>Trying to address this part of your question -"This question stems from the fact that all data scientists state that data generated by people will grow exponentially and whe need as many data scientists as possible to tackle this phenomenon. And so I wondered what will be the difference between what we can discover now in our data and what can we discover in the future when we will have exponentially more data."It depends on what field the data is related to - is it related to areas we already know a lot about - it probably wont make a whole lot of difference if the distribution of the data is similar to your current data set.If the data is related to areas where we did not have a whole lot of existing data - space, weather or even all the new fitness trackers we all wear these days.The fitness tracker data wasnt available a few years back, so more data is probably going to change the data, especially once the adoption moves from the early adopters (tech and fitness geeks) to other people - old people. kids etc - bet there is not much data related to them.Without knowing what type of data, the amount and quality of existing data, it is hard to generalize.</h2>

<h2><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Confirm</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em></h2><h2><em><u>#Brainliest</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Answer</u></em></h2>

3 0

3 years ago