Given the equation A=250(1.1)t, you can determine that the interest is compounded annually and the interest rate is 10%. Suppose
2 answers:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The interest rate is 10% or 0.1
n = 1
The compound interest formula is :
n is the number of times amount is compounded.
Lets say the interest rate were to change to being compounded quarterly.
So, here A, p will remain same, r will be divided by 4 and n will change to 4.
So, new equation will be :
=>
The approximate new interest rate will be = and in percentage it is 2.50%.
You might be interested in
Given:
The ratio is:
1.5 kg : 350 g
To find:
The lowest or simplest form of the given ratio.
Solution:
We know that,
1 kg = 1000 g
We have,
1.5 kg : 350 g
It can be written as
Therefore, the lowest form of the given ratio is 30:7.
Euclid's fifth postulate states, rather wordily, that:
<em>if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, </em><span><em>the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side </em><em>on</em><em> which are the angles less than the two right angles.
</em></span>
<em />If that sounds like a mouthful to you, you're not alone. Geometers throughout history found that postulate incredibly awkwardly-worded compared with his other four, and many in the 19th century rejected it outright and created a number of interesting new geometries from its ashes.
Euclid's fifth, put another way, states that two lines that aren't parallel will eventually meet, which consequently implies that <em>two parallel lines will never meet</em>. Without intending it, this property defines the space of Euclid's geometry to be <em>an infinite flat plane</em>.
If we take that parallel postulate and throw it out<em>, </em>then we've defined a <em>spherical space</em> for our geometry. Now, it doesn't matter where we draw our lines; <em>all of them will meet at some point</em>. If you need any convincing of this, take a look at the attached image. The longitude lines <em>seem </em>parallel at first, but they all eventually meet at the north and south poles.
<em>if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, </em><span><em>the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side </em><em>on</em><em> which are the angles less than the two right angles.
</em></span>
<em />If that sounds like a mouthful to you, you're not alone. Geometers throughout history found that postulate incredibly awkwardly-worded compared with his other four, and many in the 19th century rejected it outright and created a number of interesting new geometries from its ashes.
Euclid's fifth, put another way, states that two lines that aren't parallel will eventually meet, which consequently implies that <em>two parallel lines will never meet</em>. Without intending it, this property defines the space of Euclid's geometry to be <em>an infinite flat plane</em>.
If we take that parallel postulate and throw it out<em>, </em>then we've defined a <em>spherical space</em> for our geometry. Now, it doesn't matter where we draw our lines; <em>all of them will meet at some point</em>. If you need any convincing of this, take a look at the attached image. The longitude lines <em>seem </em>parallel at first, but they all eventually meet at the north and south poles.