1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NemiM [27]
2 years ago
7

What is the area of this trapezoid? ____ sq ft PLEASE HELP!!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
nalin [4]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(19+13)*14/2= 217 sq ft

You might be interested in
Kristin bought 8 books for a total of $238.60. Math books cost $29.60 and
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer: 2 Math books and 6 English books

5 0
3 years ago
The lines in the graph of part A don't intersect at two whole numbers on the coordinate grid. Estimate the values of the solutio
mariarad [96]

Answer:

The solution lies at approximately (4.25,6.5).

Step-by-step explanation:

The estimate is pretty close for both equations. For the first equation, the estimate results in a value that is only 0.2125 units away from the constant. For the second equation, the estimate results in a value that is only 0.25 units away from the constant.

5 0
2 years ago
Which multiplication has a negative answer?
ki77a [65]
C has a negative answer. hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
EXAMPLE 5 Find the maximum value of the function f(x, y, z) = x + 2y + 11z on the curve of intersection of the plane x − y + z =
Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

\displaystyle x= -\frac{10}{\sqrt{269}}\\\\\displaystyle y= \frac{13}{\sqrt{269}}\\\\\displaystyle z = \frac{23\sqrt{269}+269}{269}

<em>Maximum value of f=2.41</em>

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Lagrange Multipliers</u>

It's a method to optimize (maximize or minimize) functions of more than one variable subject to equality restrictions.

Given a function of three variables f(x,y,z) and a restriction in the form of an equality g(x,y,z)=0, then we are interested in finding the values of x,y,z where both gradients are parallel, i.e.

\bigtriangledown  f=\lambda \bigtriangledown  g

for some scalar \lambda called the Lagrange multiplier.

For more than one restriction, say g(x,y,z)=0 and h(x,y,z)=0, the Lagrange condition is

\bigtriangledown  f=\lambda \bigtriangledown  g+\mu \bigtriangledown  h

The gradient of f is

\bigtriangledown  f=

Considering each variable as independent we have three equations right from the Lagrange condition, plus one for each restriction, to form a 5x5 system of equations in x,y,z,\lambda,\mu.

We have

f(x, y, z) = x + 2y + 11z\\g(x, y, z) = x - y + z -1=0\\h(x, y, z) = x^2 + y^2 -1= 0

Let's compute the partial derivatives

f_x=1\ ,f_y=2\ ,f_z=11\ \\g_x=1\ ,g_y=-1\ ,g_z=1\\h_x=2x\ ,h_y=2y\ ,h_z=0

The Lagrange condition leads to

1=\lambda (1)+\mu (2x)\\2=\lambda (-1)+\mu (2y)\\11=\lambda (1)+\mu (0)

Operating and simplifying

1=\lambda+2x\mu\\2=-\lambda +2y\mu \\\lambda=11

Replacing the value of \lambda in the two first equations, we get

1=11+2x\mu\\2=-11 +2y\mu

From the first equation

\displaystyle 2\mu=\frac{-10}{x}

Replacing into the second

\displaystyle 13=y\frac{-10}{x}

Or, equivalently

13x=-10y

Squaring

169x^2=100y^2

To solve, we use the restriction h

x^2 + y^2 = 1

Multiplying by 100

100x^2 + 100y^2 = 100

Replacing the above condition

100x^2 + 169x^2 = 100

Solving for x

\displaystyle x=\pm \frac{10}{\sqrt{269}}

We compute the values of y by solving

13x=-10y

\displaystyle y=-\frac{13x}{10}

For

\displaystyle x= \frac{10}{\sqrt{269}}

\displaystyle y= -\frac{13}{\sqrt{269}}

And for

\displaystyle x= -\frac{10}{\sqrt{269}}

\displaystyle y= \frac{13}{\sqrt{269}}

Finally, we get z using the other restriction

x - y + z = 1

Or:

z = 1-x+y

The first solution yields to

\displaystyle z = 1-\frac{10}{\sqrt{269}}-\frac{13}{\sqrt{269}}

\displaystyle z = \frac{-23\sqrt{269}+269}{269}

And the second solution gives us

\displaystyle z = 1+\frac{10}{\sqrt{269}}+\frac{13}{\sqrt{269}}

\displaystyle z = \frac{23\sqrt{269}+269}{269}

Complete first solution:

\displaystyle x= \frac{10}{\sqrt{269}}\\\\\displaystyle y= -\frac{13}{\sqrt{269}}\\\\\displaystyle z = \frac{-23\sqrt{269}+269}{269}

Replacing into f, we get

f(x,y,z)=-0.4

Complete second solution:

\displaystyle x= -\frac{10}{\sqrt{269}}\\\\\displaystyle y= \frac{13}{\sqrt{269}}\\\\\displaystyle z = \frac{23\sqrt{269}+269}{269}

Replacing into f, we get

f(x,y,z)=2.4

The second solution maximizes f to 2.4

5 0
3 years ago
What number is 10% of 42
vampirchik [111]

Answer:

4.2

Step-by-step explanation:

10% of 42 is 4.2

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Solve for x in the equation x^2-10x+12=35
    6·2 answers
  • Round 543,982 to the nearest thousand.
    11·2 answers
  • Factor the expression completely. 12X+18
    15·1 answer
  • A triangle has the measures 23° &amp; 48°, what is the 3rd angle?​
    11·2 answers
  • HELP PLS !! WORTH 62 PTS !!!
    6·2 answers
  • Select all the correct answers.
    8·1 answer
  • How do you graph y=−x−2.
    8·2 answers
  • 28 + 24 as a product of two factors using the GCF and the distributtive property
    14·1 answer
  • I don’t know the equation :(
    9·2 answers
  • What is porpotinal to 1/5
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!