After she worked out the problem, she had a discrepancy (disagreement) of
about 45% between her estimate and the quotient.
That's a lot ! There's almost definitely a major mistake somewhere, and
there really isn't any way to tell whether the mistake is in the estimate or
in the quotient.
My answer to the question is that Lilly has to go all the way back to the
beginning, and do the whole thing again. Only this time, she has a harder
job to do: She not only has to make another estimate and work out the
division problem again. This time, she also has to find the mistake that
she made the first time ... and there may be more than one of them.
You should have drawn1 - x-axis and y-axis in light pencil.2 - graphed a down-facing parabola with the top of the frown on the y-axis at y = 2. It should be crossing the x-axis at ±√2. This should be in dark pencil or another color.3 - In dark pencil or a completely new color, draw a rectangle with one of the horizontal sides sitting on top of the x-axis and the other horizontal side touching the parabola at each of the top corners of the rectangle. The rectangle will have half of its base in the positive x-axis and the other half on the negative x-axis. It should be split right down the middle by the y-axis. So each half of the base we will say is "x" units long. So the whole base is 2x units long (the x units to the right of the y-axis, and the x units to the left of the y-axis) I so wish I could draw you this picture... In the vertical direction, both vertical edges are the same length and we will call that y. The area that we want to maximize has a width 2x long, and a height of y tall. So A = 2xy This is the equation we want to maximize (take derivative and set it = 0), we call it the "primary equation", but we need it in one variable. This is where the "secondary equation" comes in. We need to find a way to change the area formula to all x's or all y's. Since it is constrained to having its height limited by the parabola, we could use the fact that y=2 - x2 to make the area formula in only x's. Substitute in place of the "y", "2 - x2" into the area formula. A = 2xy = 2x(2 - x2) then simplify A = 4x - 2x3 NOW you are ready to take the deriv and set it = 0 dA/dx = 4 - 6x2 0 = 4 - 6x2 6x2 = 4 x2 = 4/6 or 2/3 So x = ±√(2/3) Width remember was 2x. So the width is 2[√(2/3)]Height is y which is 2 - x2 = 2 - 2/3 =4/3
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, ACD = BCD by AAS since they have 2 congruent angles & share a side.
Answer:
$38,465
Step-by-step explanation:
35 x 1,099 = 38,465
