1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kamila [148]
3 years ago
10

66 POINTS! Which is true about the four atoms shown in figures A, B, C, and D?

Physics
2 answers:
Inessa05 [86]3 years ago
8 0

-- A and B are the same element.

-- C and D are the same element, and a different element than A and B.

This is <em>choice-A</em> .

It all comes down to counting the number of protons in the nucleus of each atom.

Butoxors [25]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

A and B are isotopes of one another but the same element

C and D are isotopes of one another but the same element

However, A and B have a different proton count than C and D, indicating different elements because the proton count is equivalent to the atomic number.

You might be interested in
What would happen if all the toilets were flushed at once?
Sliva [168]

Answer:

nothing would happen

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the source of the radioactivity?
Nataly_w [17]
The Earth itself is a source of terrestrial radiation. Radioactive materials including uranium, thorium, and radium exist naturally in soil and rock. Essentially all air contains radon<span> , which is responsible for most of the dose that Americans receive each year from natural background sources.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
A temperature of 20°C is equal to <br> °F.
babymother [125]
The temperature of 20°C is equal to 68.0<span>°F</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ! PLZ! PLZ! HELP! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! Scientific Claim Engaging in scientific argument is a critical piece to the applicati
Nastasia [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

1The study of science and engineering should produce a sense of the process of argument necessary for advancing and defending a new idea or an explanation of a phenomenon and the norms for conducting such arguments. In that spirit, students should argue for the explanations they construct, defend their interpretations of the associated data, and advocate for the designs they propose. (NRC Framework, 2012, p. 73)

Argumentation is a process for reaching agreements about explanations and design solutions. In science, reasoning and argument based on evidence are essential in identifying the best explanation for a natural phenomenon. In engineering, reasoning and argument are needed to identify the best solution to a design problem. Student engagement in scientific argumentation is critical if students are to understand the culture in which scientists live, and how to apply science and engineering for the benefit of society. As such, argument is a process based on evidence and reasoning that leads to explanations acceptable by the scientific community and design solutions acceptable by the engineering community.

Argument in science goes beyond reaching agreements in explanations and design solutions. Whether investigating a phenomenon, testing a design, or constructing a model to provide a mechanism for an explanation, students are expected to use argumentation to listen to, compare, and evaluate competing ideas and methods based on their merits. Scientists and engineers engage in argumentation when investigating a phenomenon, testing a design solution, resolving questions about measurements, building data models, and using evidence to evaluate claims.

Compare and critique two arguments on the same topic and analyze whether they emphasize similar or different evidence and/or interpretations of facts.

Respectfully provide and receive critiques about one’s explanations, procedures, models and questions by citing relevant evidence and posing and responding to questions that elicit pertinent elaboration and detail.

Construct, use, and/or present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support or refute an explanation or a model for a phenomenon or a solution to a problem.

Make an oral or written argument that supports or refutes the advertised performance of a device, process, or system, based on empirical evidence concerning whether or not the technology meets relevant criteria and constraints.

Evaluate competing design solutions based on jointly developed and agreed-upon design criteria.

8 0
2 years ago
What should you do if someone on foot approaches your car while you are in it?
tatyana61 [14]
It depends. If you are driving and the person doesn't look like a serial killer, you should stop.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do you find the number of neutrons
    10·1 answer
  • A block of unknown mass is attached to a spring with a spring constant of 6.50 N/m and undergoes simple harmonic motion with an
    12·1 answer
  • What stages of life has Betelgeuse already lived through?
    14·1 answer
  • Question 12
    12·1 answer
  • A compound consisting of Cr3+ ions and OH ions would be named chromium (III) hydroxide
    15·2 answers
  • How long has a victim been dead if his body temperature was 89.2°F?
    9·2 answers
  • The data points you have taken on your lab graphs roughly form a straight line. How do you interpret the slope of this line?
    12·2 answers
  • Look at the simple machine shown below and determine the mechanical
    9·1 answer
  • A solid sphere of radius R, a solid cylinder of radius R, and a rod of length R all have the same mass, and all three are rotati
    12·1 answer
  • A projectile is to be launched at an angle of 30° so that it falls beyond the pond of length 20 meters as shown in the figure.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!