Answer:
The answer has been stated below.
Explanation:
There would also have been more people living all over the world, and peoples' skin colors would have evolved slowly over the years and the people inhabited at higher altitudes would have created more variability because the amount of exposure would have varied as people move around the world. People would have traveled around the earth, but they kept the DNA of their skin color.
<span>His nonviolent actions were inspirational in other nonaggressive movements around the world.</span>
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Desafortunadamente no mencionas a qué país haces referencia.
Sin embargo, con el deseo de ayudarte y a pesar de que se te olvidó incluir el país, podemos comentarte las siguientes ideas generales.
Los 3 aspectos positivos que permiten los ciudadanos identificarse como un país intercultural son la solidaridad, la hermandad, y los símbolos patrios.
Los 3 aspectos negativos que no han permitido se desarrolle de la mejor manera, la interculturalidad son la falta de respeto, la intolerancia, y el elitismo.
Para que los miembros de un país se puedan identificar con los valores que éste representan dentro de un entorno intercultural, debe existir un amplio respeto y reconocimiento a la diversidad. Sí, hoy en día es determinante el que los ciudadanos reconozcan que en un mismo país hay diversas maneras de ser y de pensar.
Es precisamente la pluralidad de ideas y comportamientos en diferentes ámbitos de la sociedad, lo que permite desarrollar el concepto de interculturalidad.
They are likely to reason out that the third world nations are undeveloped because of their lack of modern economic activities and they are not well introduced to new techniques or machines that have made them to lack and to be underdeveloped than other world nations.
The justification was based around the facts that the King of Britain was used to involving the colonies in his own wars and imposing laws without having representatives from the colonies in the British Parliament. John Locke's social contract was important because people believed that they should have what he defined as unalienable rights and that they should have consent of the governed.
