a short microscopic hairlike vibrating structure found in large numbers on the surface of certain cells.
Explanation:
either causing currents in the surrounding fluid, or, in some protozoans and other small organisms, providing propulsion.
Answer:
Hence the evaporation rate in pints per minute is 0.001583.
Explanation:
Now,
1.5 gallons of paint are used.
It has 5% solid, so total 95% of 1.5 gallon can evaporate(only the solvent part will evaporate).
95% of 1.5 gallon=(95/100)*1.5 = 1.425 gallons.
1gallon = 8 pints.
So 1.425 gallons=8*1.425 pints
=11.4 pints.
Evaporation requires 2 hours. That is 3600*2 seconds = 7200 seconds.
So evaporation rate= 11.4 pints/7200 seconds.
=0.001583 pints per second
Answer:
Difference between concentrated acid and weak acid :---
- According to Arrhenius's theory the substances which easily get dissociated into H+ ions when dissolved in water are acids.
- And the substance which readily gives H+ ions on dissociation (when dissolved in water) are Strong Acid. Examples are HCl , H2SO4 etc.
While,
- Concentration of acid is just the value of pH. pH is the measurement of concentration of acid or base. The lower the pH, higher the concentration.
- So strong acid is strong because it gives H+ ions readily in water and Concentration is the value of pH.
To know this you pretty much do have to kind of memorize a few electronegativities. I don't recall ever getting a table of electronegativities on an exam.
From the structure, you have:
I remember the following electronegativities most because they are fairly patterned:
EN
H
=
2.1
EN
C
=
2.5
EN
N
=
3.0
EN
O
=
3.5
EN
F
=
4.0
EN
Cl
=
3.5
Notice how carbon through fluorine go in increments of
~
0.5
. I believe Pauling made it that way when he determined electronegativities in the '30s.
Δ
EN
C
−
Cl
=
1.0
Δ
EN
C
−
H
=
0.4
Δ
EN
C
−
C
=
0.0
Δ
EN
C
−
O
=
1.0
Δ
EN
O
−
H
=
1.4
So naturally, with the greatest electronegativity difference of
4.0
−
2.5
=
1.5
, the
C
−
F
bond is most polar, i.e. that bond's electron distribution is the most drawn towards the more electronegative compound as compared to the rest.
When the electron distribution is polarized and drawn towards a more electronegative atom, the less electronegative atom has to move inwards because its nucleus was previously favorably attracted to the electrons from the other atom.
That means generally, the greater the electronegativity difference between two atoms is, the shorter you can expect the bond to be, insofar as the electronegative atom is the same size as another comparable electronegative atom.
However, examining actual data, we would see that on average, in conditions without other bond polarizations occuring:
r
C
−
Cl
≈
177 pm
r
C
−
C
≈
154 pm
r
C
−
O
≈
143 pm
r
C
−
F
≈
135 pm
r
C
−
H
≈
109 pm
r
O
−
H
≈
96 pm
So it is not necessarily the least electronegativity difference that gives the longest bond.
Therefore, you cannot simply consider electronegativity. Examining the radii of the atoms, you should notice that chlorine is the biggest atom in the compound.
r
Cl
≈
79 pm
r
C
≈
70 pm
r
H
≈
53 pm
r
O
≈
60 pm
So assuming the answer is truly
C
−
C
, what would have to hold true is that:
The
C
−
F
bond polarization makes the carbon more electropositive (which is true).
The now more electropositive carbon wishes to attract bonding pairs from chlorine closer, thereby shortening the
C
−
Cl
bond, and potentially the
C
−
H
bond (which is probably true).
The shortening of the
C
−
Cl
bond is somehow enough to be shorter than the
C
−
C
bond (this is debatable).
Answer:
Bonding Order = number of bonding electrons – number of antibonding electrons/2.
So for CO2, there is a total of 16 electrons, 8 of which are antibonding electrons.
So 16 – 8 = 8; divided by 2 = 4. So, 4 is the bonding order of CO2. The molecular structure of CO2 looks like this:
..~-~~..
O=C=O
..~-~~..
