Please help: Triangle ABC is similar to triangle PQR where

Reason What does the graph of a function tell<br> you about the multiplicity of a zero?

Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

If the graph crosses the x-axis and appears almost linear at the intercept, it is a single zero. If the graph touches the x-axis and bounces off of the axis, it is a zero with even multiplicity. If the graph crosses the x-axis at a zero, it is a zero with odd multiplicity. The sum of the multiplicities is n.

4 0

2 years ago

Write an expression for the following situation and solve it. Mr. Simms bought 20 pencils. He used 1/4 of the pencils and then g

Nitella [24]

Hi!
1/4 of 20 pencils are 5 pencils.
Since he gave away 4 pencils,
Total = 5 + 4 = 9
Mr. Simms use and give away total 9 pencils.

4 0

2 years ago

The ratio of the areas of the two squares is 25 to 9. The side length of the smaller square is 30 meters. How long is the side l

Ratling [72]

Ratios of Area of the two squares = 25:9
So then let the areas be A1 = 25A and A2 = 9A, A is common element
Side of the smaller area S2 = 30 meters
Area of the smaller square A2 = 30 x 30 = 900
We have area of smaller square as 9A = 900 => A = 100
Area of the large square = 25A = 25 x 100 = 2500.
Hence S1^2 = 2500 => S1 = 50 meters which is 20 meters longer than the
side of the smaller square.

6 0

2 years ago

A study was conducted to determine whether magnets were effective in treating pain. The values represent measurements of pain us

Zanzabum

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The objective of the study is to determine whether the magnets are effective in treating pain. For these two independent groups of individuals with equal affections were randomly sampled, one was treated with magnets and the other group of individuals, call it control group, was treated with a placebo treatment.

The information for both samples is:

X₁: pain measurement using a visual analog scale after the individual received magnet treatments.

X₁~N(μ₁;σ₁²)

n₁= 20

X[bar]₁= 0.46

S₁= 0.93

X₂: pain measurement using a visual analog scale of an individual of the control groups.

X₂~N(μ₂;σ₂²)

n₂= 20

X[bar]₂= 0.41

S₂= 1.26

The claim is that the pain reductions of the control group have more variation than the pain reductions of the target group. If it's so then we could suspect that the population variance of the control group, σ₂², will be greater than the population variance of the magnet group, σ₁².

To test the relationship between these two population variances you have to conduct a variance ratio test using the Snedecors F statistic.

The hypotheses are:

H₀: σ₂² ≤ σ₁²

H₁: σ₂² > σ₁²

α: 0.05

$F= (\frac{S_2^2}{S_1^2}) * (\frac{Sigma_2^2}{Sigma_1^2} )~~ F_{(n_2-1);(n_1-1)}$

This hypothesis test is one-tailed to the right, there is only one critical value:

$F_{(n_2-1);(n_1-1); 1 - \alpha } = F_{19;19; 0.95}= 2.17$

The decision rule for the test is:

If $F_{H_0}$ ≥ 2.17, then the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If $F_{H_0}$ < 2.17, then the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

$F_{H_0}= \frac{S_2^2}{S_1^2}*\frac{Sigma_2^2}{Sigma_1^2} = \frac{(1.26)^2}{(0.93)^2} * 1$

$F_{H_0} = 1.835 = 1.84$

Since the calculated value of F is less than the critical value, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis. So using a 5% significance level the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis, you can conclude that the population variance of the pain reduction of the control group is less or equal than the population variance of the pain reduction on individuals treated with magnets.

I hope it helps!

3 0

2 years ago

Write equivalent expression for 7× + 4× + 3-1

Mazyrski [523]

Answer: you just flip it. It would be the opposite.

Step-by-step explanation:

When you flip it, what’s the difference? It’s still the same.

6 0

2 years ago